A hula hoop. That is what Alvin wants most. And he wants it with all his little chipmunk heart. So, with his brothers he ardently pleads: “We can hardly stand the wait. / Please, Christmas, don’t be late.”
As surely as the hours march on and the sun rises and sets, December the 25th will come right when it is supposed to. Surely that means Christmas will too. After all, even the Grinch, with all his Grinchy plotting and planning could not stop Christmas from coming to the Whos down in Whoville. Like them, we know that Christmas can come without “packages, boxes, or bags.” Yes, it can come even without a hula hoop.
To the Whos, Christmas came with the dawn of that wintery day. For the Grinch, however, it took a little while longer. So could Christmas, in fact, be late? At some point in our lives, we will likely find that it can.
In accordance with heavenly timetables, that first Christmas night came on schedule for Mary and Joseph. That same night, the shepherds and the Nephites received their own glad tidings of great joy. Yet for some, Christmas took a bit longer to arrive. It was over a month before the infant Jesus was brought to the temple. Only then did Anna and Simeon receive their Christmas day. For the Wise Men from the East, Christmas came much, much later. Still, it came.
In our day, Christmas can be late for many reasons. We are grateful for the doctors and nurses, the police officers, the firefighters, and the other first responders who willingly put their festivities on hold for the sake of us all. Christmas can also be late for those serving at gas stations, stores, restaurants, or other businesses that remain open. Christmas may come late when family members are serving in the military, when loved ones are traveling from far away, or when the in-laws have their turn at hosting. Whether on December the 25th or some later date, Christmas still comes.
But for some, it may feel as though Christmas will never come. There are those who face empty mailboxes, empty cupboards, and empty chairs. Others may find their holiday feast served on a solitary hospital tray. And sometimes we all, like the Grinch, find our hearts shrunken by the stresses and struggles of life and the season. We tell ourselves that “next year all our troubles will be miles away” and “until then we’ll have to muddle through somehow.”
Even in such times, the song still enjoins, “have yourself a merry little Christmas now.” For no matter our circumstances, we all “need a little Christmas” and sometimes we need it “right this very minute.” But as the Grinch learned, Christmas comes to those who welcome it, with open arms and open hearts. It will come as we remember Christ, our Savior, and welcome Him into our lives. And it will come as we remember why He came.
Our Christmas may not come as “the stars are brightly shining.” It may not come with “yuletide carols being sung by a choir.” And it may not even come with a hula hoop. But as we open our hearts to Christ – our Prince of Peace, our Light of Life, our Messiah in the Manger – whether it be sooner or later, Christmas will come.
Merry Christmas!
22 December 2019
22 April 2019
Penguins
Year: 2019
Director: David Fowler
Starring: Steve the penguin, lots and lots of other penguins, Ed Helms (narrator)
Tagline: For Steve, his adventure isn't all black and white
Starring: Steve the penguin, lots and lots of other penguins, Ed Helms (narrator)
Tagline: For Steve, his adventure isn't all black and white
Synopsis: Disneynature presents a documentary about adelie penguins in Antarctica.
Review
Penguins are adorable. Do you really need any reason other than that to go see this film? They are adorable when they are waddling, when they are tobogganing, and when they are swimming. They are adorable when they are elegant and stately. They are adorable when they are clumsy and stumbling. Penguins are adorable.
The story line of the documentary follows one penguin in particular. The filmmakers named him "Steve." Throughout the story, we follow Steve as he makes his way to the nesting grounds, finds a mate, and helps raise his chicks in the unforgiving Antarctic environment.
There are lots of fun moments throughout the film. Steve is a bit of a clutz. He's also good at getting himself a little lost. One of my favorites moments is when Steve makes an accidental detour through a colony of (much bigger) emperor penguins.
There were some points where the narration got a bit cheesy. But for the most part, it was fun and informative. Mostly I learned that adelie penguins go through a lot to survive, and through even more to successfully raise their chicks.
The film is rated G. The whole family can enjoy this documentary. I believe one nameless penguin does fall victim to a leopard seal. That's the circle of life ... sorta.
Penguins is a fun, lovable documentary. It's also beautiful, because nature -- even at its most frigid -- is beautiful. I recommend seeing this on the big screen to fully appreciate that beauty. Also, stay through the credits to watch behind the scenes footage of the filmmakers out there recording all those penguins.
The story line of the documentary follows one penguin in particular. The filmmakers named him "Steve." Throughout the story, we follow Steve as he makes his way to the nesting grounds, finds a mate, and helps raise his chicks in the unforgiving Antarctic environment.
There are lots of fun moments throughout the film. Steve is a bit of a clutz. He's also good at getting himself a little lost. One of my favorites moments is when Steve makes an accidental detour through a colony of (much bigger) emperor penguins.
There were some points where the narration got a bit cheesy. But for the most part, it was fun and informative. Mostly I learned that adelie penguins go through a lot to survive, and through even more to successfully raise their chicks.
The film is rated G. The whole family can enjoy this documentary. I believe one nameless penguin does fall victim to a leopard seal. That's the circle of life ... sorta.
Penguins is a fun, lovable documentary. It's also beautiful, because nature -- even at its most frigid -- is beautiful. I recommend seeing this on the big screen to fully appreciate that beauty. Also, stay through the credits to watch behind the scenes footage of the filmmakers out there recording all those penguins.
Quotable Quotes
- "Don't panic." -- Steve, repeatedly to himself and later to his chicks
- "I just got beat up by a baby." -- Steve, after an altercation with an emperor penguin chick
17 April 2019
Shazam!
Year: 2019
Director: David F. Sandberg
Starring: Zachary Levi, Asher Angel, Mark Strong, Jack Dylan Grazer, and Djimon Hounsou
Tagline: Just Say the Word
Starring: Zachary Levi, Asher Angel, Mark Strong, Jack Dylan Grazer, and Djimon Hounsou
Tagline: Just Say the Word
Synopsis: Orphaned 14-year-old Billy Batson finds himself thrust into the world of superheroes when a wizard gives him superpowers whenever he says the name "Shazam."
Review
When I saw the first trailers for Shazam! I wasn't sure what to expect. It seemed like it could possibly be fun. The premise of a 14-year-old finding himself in the body of a superpowered adult is intriguing, but it could also be super annoying.
I'm pleased to report that Shazam! is super fun and a welcome new take on the superhero genre.
The key to the film is Zachary Levi, who portrays Shazam (well, "Captain Marvel" ... but that's complicated due to all sorts of legal reasons and that other comic book studio). He basically has to portray a 14-year-old, but what it would be like to be 14 in a grown up body. Levi nails it. He's likable and charismatic with the right amount of naivete. Also perfect is Asher Angel, who portrays Billy Batson in his normal form.
Mark Strong does a great job as the villain. We get as much villain backstory in Shazam! as we do hero backstory. Knowing Dr. Sivana's backstory makes him a much more intriguing (and threatening) villain.
Shazam! is very funny, especially as Billy is trying to figure out his new powers. He has no idea what he's doing and Freddy isn't the best of coaches.
It was also fun to see how the movie tied into the larger DC universe. Shazam and these characters inhabit the same world as Superman, Batman, Wonder Woman, and Aquaman. The story doesn't make a big deal out of that. It's not a huge plot point. But there's just enough of it to tease possible future crossovers.
But for as funny as the movie is, where it really shines is in the relationships; they are the heart of the story. Billy is an abandoned kid looking for his mom. Instead, he finds himself in yet another foster home. It takes becoming a superhero to teach him what matters most in life.
The film is rated PG-13 and is more intense than I was expecting. The seven deadly sin monsters are quite creepy and violent. There was also a fair amount of swearing, mostly the S-word. And a character gives "the finger" to a few characters. I'd say this one is definitely not for the younger kids.
Shazam! is another example of DC getting its act together and rolling out films that are true to their roots and also fun. Shazam! is fun. It's the wish-fulfillment side of superheroes. And it's about finding the hero within yourself. Be sure to stay through the credits. There's a mid-credits stinger (which, like me, you may need to Google to understand) and a very funny post-credits scene.
*** Spoiler Section ***
I'm glad I didn't know anything about Shazam/Captain Marvel going into the film. It made the climax so much more rewarding. There was foreshadowing of course, so it wasn't a complete surprise. But not knowing exactly how things would play out to win the final fight made it more fun.
As for Shazam the wizard? Yeah, he's a pretty terrible recruiter. Not very good at working with kids, motivating improvement, or explaining things.
Originally, Henry Cavill (Superman) was supposed to make an actual cameo. But his schedule didn't work for when they needed to film. I think it is actually funnier to have Superman show up but not see his face or hear him say anything.
I'm pleased to report that Shazam! is super fun and a welcome new take on the superhero genre.
The key to the film is Zachary Levi, who portrays Shazam (well, "Captain Marvel" ... but that's complicated due to all sorts of legal reasons and that other comic book studio). He basically has to portray a 14-year-old, but what it would be like to be 14 in a grown up body. Levi nails it. He's likable and charismatic with the right amount of naivete. Also perfect is Asher Angel, who portrays Billy Batson in his normal form.
Mark Strong does a great job as the villain. We get as much villain backstory in Shazam! as we do hero backstory. Knowing Dr. Sivana's backstory makes him a much more intriguing (and threatening) villain.
Shazam! is very funny, especially as Billy is trying to figure out his new powers. He has no idea what he's doing and Freddy isn't the best of coaches.
It was also fun to see how the movie tied into the larger DC universe. Shazam and these characters inhabit the same world as Superman, Batman, Wonder Woman, and Aquaman. The story doesn't make a big deal out of that. It's not a huge plot point. But there's just enough of it to tease possible future crossovers.
But for as funny as the movie is, where it really shines is in the relationships; they are the heart of the story. Billy is an abandoned kid looking for his mom. Instead, he finds himself in yet another foster home. It takes becoming a superhero to teach him what matters most in life.
The film is rated PG-13 and is more intense than I was expecting. The seven deadly sin monsters are quite creepy and violent. There was also a fair amount of swearing, mostly the S-word. And a character gives "the finger" to a few characters. I'd say this one is definitely not for the younger kids.
Shazam! is another example of DC getting its act together and rolling out films that are true to their roots and also fun. Shazam! is fun. It's the wish-fulfillment side of superheroes. And it's about finding the hero within yourself. Be sure to stay through the credits. There's a mid-credits stinger (which, like me, you may need to Google to understand) and a very funny post-credits scene.
*** Spoiler Section ***
I'm glad I didn't know anything about Shazam/Captain Marvel going into the film. It made the climax so much more rewarding. There was foreshadowing of course, so it wasn't a complete surprise. But not knowing exactly how things would play out to win the final fight made it more fun.
As for Shazam the wizard? Yeah, he's a pretty terrible recruiter. Not very good at working with kids, motivating improvement, or explaining things.
Originally, Henry Cavill (Superman) was supposed to make an actual cameo. But his schedule didn't work for when they needed to film. I think it is actually funnier to have Superman show up but not see his face or hear him say anything.
Quotable Quotes
- "Hey, what's up? I'm a superhero." -- Shazam
- "Say my name!" "Billy!" "Not that name." -- Shazam and his foster siblings
- "Are you making some, like, big, evil-guy speech right now or something? You're like a mile away from me and there's traffic and cars and stuff. All I see is mouth moving." -- Shazam to Dr. Sivana
09 April 2019
Dumbo
Year: 2019
Director: Tim Burton
Starring: Colin Farrell, Eva Green, Danny DeVito, Michael Keaton, Nico Parker, Finley Hobbins, and a (CGI) baby elephant
Tagline: A beloved tale will take you to new heights
Starring: Colin Farrell, Eva Green, Danny DeVito, Michael Keaton, Nico Parker, Finley Hobbins, and a (CGI) baby elephant
Tagline: A beloved tale will take you to new heights
Synopsis: Dumbo, a baby circus elephant, goes from laughing stock to center ring when it is discovered his oversized ears allow him to fly.
Review
It has probably been at least 25 years since I saw the animated Dumbo. I remember not liking it as a kid and never found a reason to watch it again. Having Dumbo separated from his mom was rather traumatic. And those pink elephants on parade when Dumbo accidentally gets drunk? Yeesh!
So, I went into this live-action Dumbo with low expectations. And although it is by no means a great film, it was more enjoyable than I expected.
The relationship between Dumbo and his mom is still the heart of the story. We don't get as much from her. She's portrayed as a more realistic elephant. But Dumbo's attachment and longing for her are endearing and hold the story together. "Baby Mine" is still there, but sung by a member of the circus troupe.
Also still there are those pink elephants on parade. But this time they are bubbles, and part of a choreographed bubble show. It's still a little weird, but it fits with the story. Dumbo simply watches the bubbles in awe. Earlier in the film there is even a joke about "no booze for the baby" elephant.
Rather than have Dumbo's friend be a mouse, this time around the little elephant is befriended first by two children and then the rest of the circus performers. Having little Dumbo find encouragement from two motherless children does work within the story. But the humans aren't particularly strong characters.
The human characters all felt rather flat or stock. The characters we were supposed to like were likable enough. The characters we weren't supposed to like were clearly unlikable. In fact, Michael Keaton's V.A. Vandevere was downright obnoxious. He was the most over-the-top part of the movie. And that's saying something for a movie with a flying elephant.
The film's saving grace is the little elephant himself. Dumbo is pretty adorable. He ends up loyal and brave but starts out feeling alone and scared. His longing for his mom is touching. And each time he takes flight, it is suitably thrilling.
The film is rated PG for some intense scenes (intense for little ones that is) and one almost cuss word (his kids purposefully interrupt him).
Dumbo is by no means a great film. But it was more enjoyable than I expected. The titular elephant is indeed quite cute and lovable. He really does carry the movie. The humans are ... serviceable. I'd say it is worth seeing via Redbox or on Netflix. It's worth seeing an elephant fly.
*** Spoiler Section ***
I liked the way the film wrapped everything up. The climactic rescue was clever enough and once again showcased Dumbo's loyalty and bravery. It also had the right amount of humor. It was also nice to have all the human characters have a fresh start in the all new Medici Family Circus. And it was nice to see Dumbo and his mom find their way to other elephants. Mostly it was cool to have Dumbo flying through a jungle rather than a circus tent.
My question, though, is how did they afford any of that? I'm guessing it takes a sizable amount of money to send two elephants from New York to India. Even if the ship's captain didn't charge them for the ride, there would still be the cost of feeding them all those weeks. And then where did Max get the money to restart his traveling circus? Did Alan Arkin's character just decide to give Max a few thousand dollars after buying him that hot dog?
Seriously, where'd all the money come from?
So, I went into this live-action Dumbo with low expectations. And although it is by no means a great film, it was more enjoyable than I expected.
The relationship between Dumbo and his mom is still the heart of the story. We don't get as much from her. She's portrayed as a more realistic elephant. But Dumbo's attachment and longing for her are endearing and hold the story together. "Baby Mine" is still there, but sung by a member of the circus troupe.
Also still there are those pink elephants on parade. But this time they are bubbles, and part of a choreographed bubble show. It's still a little weird, but it fits with the story. Dumbo simply watches the bubbles in awe. Earlier in the film there is even a joke about "no booze for the baby" elephant.
Rather than have Dumbo's friend be a mouse, this time around the little elephant is befriended first by two children and then the rest of the circus performers. Having little Dumbo find encouragement from two motherless children does work within the story. But the humans aren't particularly strong characters.
The human characters all felt rather flat or stock. The characters we were supposed to like were likable enough. The characters we weren't supposed to like were clearly unlikable. In fact, Michael Keaton's V.A. Vandevere was downright obnoxious. He was the most over-the-top part of the movie. And that's saying something for a movie with a flying elephant.
The film's saving grace is the little elephant himself. Dumbo is pretty adorable. He ends up loyal and brave but starts out feeling alone and scared. His longing for his mom is touching. And each time he takes flight, it is suitably thrilling.
The film is rated PG for some intense scenes (intense for little ones that is) and one almost cuss word (his kids purposefully interrupt him).
Dumbo is by no means a great film. But it was more enjoyable than I expected. The titular elephant is indeed quite cute and lovable. He really does carry the movie. The humans are ... serviceable. I'd say it is worth seeing via Redbox or on Netflix. It's worth seeing an elephant fly.
*** Spoiler Section ***
I liked the way the film wrapped everything up. The climactic rescue was clever enough and once again showcased Dumbo's loyalty and bravery. It also had the right amount of humor. It was also nice to have all the human characters have a fresh start in the all new Medici Family Circus. And it was nice to see Dumbo and his mom find their way to other elephants. Mostly it was cool to have Dumbo flying through a jungle rather than a circus tent.
My question, though, is how did they afford any of that? I'm guessing it takes a sizable amount of money to send two elephants from New York to India. Even if the ship's captain didn't charge them for the ride, there would still be the cost of feeding them all those weeks. And then where did Max get the money to restart his traveling circus? Did Alan Arkin's character just decide to give Max a few thousand dollars after buying him that hot dog?
Seriously, where'd all the money come from?
Quotable Quotes
- "Is that a monkey in your desk?" "Just for emergencies." -- V.A. Vandevere and Max Medici
- "Fly, Dumbo. Fly." -- Milly Farrier
12 March 2019
Captain Marvel
Year: 2019
Director: Anna Boden and Ryan Fleck
Starring: Brie Larson, Samuel L. Jackson, Ben Mendelsohn, Jude Law, Annette Bening, Lashana Lynch, Clark Gregg, Lee Pace, and a cat
Tagline: Higher. Further. Faster.
Starring: Brie Larson, Samuel L. Jackson, Ben Mendelsohn, Jude Law, Annette Bening, Lashana Lynch, Clark Gregg, Lee Pace, and a cat
Tagline: Higher. Further. Faster.
Synopsis: Vers is a Kree soldier with no memory of her past. That is until she crash-lands on Earth, teams up with a young Nick Fury, and gets caught up in a war between the Kree and the Skrulls.
Review
I read somewhere that Captain Marvel is like an origin story told in reverse. That does work to a degree. Carol/Vers starts the movie already having superpowers. The film then takes us on a journey backwards through her past to find out how she got those powers and to discover who she really is. It works and is a fresh way to introduce (yet another) hero into the MCU.
The action and story of Captain Marvel are good. And they are what you would expect in any Marvel movie at this point. It's fun to see certain characters and items from other movies reappear. This story takes place in 1995 and we get to see Agent Coulson, Ronan the Accuser, and Korath (the latter two were in Guardians of the Galaxy ... if it is getting hard to keep track). While Captain Marvel can stand alone as a film, I like how it also ties in to the story line of this universe.
You may have heard that one of the best characters in the film is Goose the cat. You heard correctly. Goose is cute, cuddly, and awesome. And the way young Nick Fury takes to him is terrific. I'd love to see a Marvel Short about Goose.
I also love Fury's character in this film. We have a younger and less jaded/cynical Fury. And his banter with both Goose and Carol really carry the film.
I also really liked Ben Mendelsohn's character, the Skrull Thalos.
But my favorite character was, appropriately, Carol Danvers (aka Vers). Maybe it's because she has the sort of sense of humor I appreciate (and sometimes wish I had if I could quip that quickly). I like that she is strong but also feels out of place and lost. She's confident and clever, but still has a few things to learn from her friends. And she glows, flies, and can plow through a spaceship on her own. So yeah, I'm a fan of Captain Marvel and am excited to see what she brings to the MCU. I also look forward to her interacting with the other characters, like Captain America.
Although I wouldn't say the movie is perfect, I also can't think of anything I'd actually change about it. I enjoyed the movie from start to finish (and to post-credits finish).
The film is rated PG-13 for the same levels of superhero violence you'd see in other MCU movies. I don't recall much swearing.
Captain Marvel is another fun and exciting superhero film. It may not bring anything new to the genre in terms of the story, but it brings new characters and sheds new light on old characters. If you enjoy superhero movies at all, I recommend Captain Marvel. It's not perfect, but it is still a great time at the movies. Be sure to stay through the credits. There's a mid-credits scene (which is the one you'd expect) and a post-credits scene (which is just funny).
*** Spoiler Section ***
So that's how Nick Fury lost his eye? Huh. It works.
Also, I love that Fury adopts Goose.
There's a moment in Wonder Woman where Diana crosses No Man's Land. You might say it is her "a hero rises" moment. Captain Marvel has its own version. It isn't quite as powerful, but it is nonetheless well done, good, and inspiring. I have dubbed it the "You're only human" scene. And it did kinda make me want to cheer: for Carol, for women, for humans in general.
The action and story of Captain Marvel are good. And they are what you would expect in any Marvel movie at this point. It's fun to see certain characters and items from other movies reappear. This story takes place in 1995 and we get to see Agent Coulson, Ronan the Accuser, and Korath (the latter two were in Guardians of the Galaxy ... if it is getting hard to keep track). While Captain Marvel can stand alone as a film, I like how it also ties in to the story line of this universe.
You may have heard that one of the best characters in the film is Goose the cat. You heard correctly. Goose is cute, cuddly, and awesome. And the way young Nick Fury takes to him is terrific. I'd love to see a Marvel Short about Goose.
I also love Fury's character in this film. We have a younger and less jaded/cynical Fury. And his banter with both Goose and Carol really carry the film.
I also really liked Ben Mendelsohn's character, the Skrull Thalos.
But my favorite character was, appropriately, Carol Danvers (aka Vers). Maybe it's because she has the sort of sense of humor I appreciate (and sometimes wish I had if I could quip that quickly). I like that she is strong but also feels out of place and lost. She's confident and clever, but still has a few things to learn from her friends. And she glows, flies, and can plow through a spaceship on her own. So yeah, I'm a fan of Captain Marvel and am excited to see what she brings to the MCU. I also look forward to her interacting with the other characters, like Captain America.
Although I wouldn't say the movie is perfect, I also can't think of anything I'd actually change about it. I enjoyed the movie from start to finish (and to post-credits finish).
The film is rated PG-13 for the same levels of superhero violence you'd see in other MCU movies. I don't recall much swearing.
Captain Marvel is another fun and exciting superhero film. It may not bring anything new to the genre in terms of the story, but it brings new characters and sheds new light on old characters. If you enjoy superhero movies at all, I recommend Captain Marvel. It's not perfect, but it is still a great time at the movies. Be sure to stay through the credits. There's a mid-credits scene (which is the one you'd expect) and a post-credits scene (which is just funny).
*** Spoiler Section ***
So that's how Nick Fury lost his eye? Huh. It works.
Also, I love that Fury adopts Goose.
There's a moment in Wonder Woman where Diana crosses No Man's Land. You might say it is her "a hero rises" moment. Captain Marvel has its own version. It isn't quite as powerful, but it is nonetheless well done, good, and inspiring. I have dubbed it the "You're only human" scene. And it did kinda make me want to cheer: for Carol, for women, for humans in general.
Quotable Quotes
- "You watched me play with tape when all you had to do was that?" "I didn't want to steal your thunder." -- Fury and Carol
- "You called this in?!" "My bad." -- Carol and Fury
- "It's a cat, not Hannibal Lecter." -- Fury, as someone muzzles Goose
- "Without us, you're only human." -- Kree Supreme Intelligence
27 February 2019
How to Train Your Dragon: The Hidden World
Year: 2019
Director: Dean DeBlois
Starring: Jay Baruchel, America Ferrera, F. Murray Abraham, Cate Blanchett, Gerard Butler, and Craig Ferguson
Tagline: Their Final Quest
Starring: Jay Baruchel, America Ferrera, F. Murray Abraham, Cate Blanchett, Gerard Butler, and Craig Ferguson
Tagline: Their Final Quest
Synopsis: Although Hiccup has succeeded in making Berk a dragon/viking utopia, a new threat emerges to threaten all of them and their way of life.
Review
It is no easy feat to tie up a trilogy. Some do it well (LOTR, Toy Story, the original Star Wars). Others ... not so much (Pirates of the Caribbean, Shrek, Spider-Man). I'm pleased to say that The Hidden World is an enjoyable, fitting, and emotionally satisfying conclusion to a great trilogy.
I really liked the movie. And if you liked the previous installments, you should definitely go see it. Take the family and see it. Enjoy one more flight with Hiccup and Toothless.
That said, the movie has its flaws. And there were a few things that were disappointing. Let's get those out of the way so we can get back to what was good.
I like all three How to Train Your Dragon movies. But let's face it, they all have a rather similar plot: someone wants to kill/enslave dragons, Hiccup tries to stop them, Hiccup fails, Toothless is captured, Hiccup goes through character growth in order to save Toothless and everybody else, Toothless does something awesome, the enemy is thwarted. Yes, there are variations. But that sums up all three movies.
I've never understood the point of characters who are purposefully annoying. Snotlout, Ruffnut, and Tuffnut are actually more annoying in this film (Fishlegs is fine and likable). The trilogy has covered six years; how have none of them matured even the slightest bit? Ruffnut and his beard and advice get old really quickly. And I'm not entirely sure what was up between Snotlout, Eret, and Valka.
Which leads me to another point. We get a lot of Hiccup's peers, but not very much of Eret or Valka, both of whom are far more interesting. Eret is basically in the movie for two reasons: 1) to offer backstory for the villain, and 2) because he is voiced by Kit Harrington who is now fairly famous thanks to his role in Game of Thrones. Valka at least has a bit more to do, and it does make sense for her to still be rather awkward in her relationship with Hiccup.
My biggest grievance with the film was the music. The first movie has an amazing soundtrack with all sorts of epic and exciting themes. The second movie carried those over. I kept waiting for them in the third movie ... and they kept not coming. The music isn't bad, but it isn't the epic music I wanted. It seemed like only one theme was reused, and not until the third act. Why?!
Sorry, enough complaints.
One thing I really liked in this film was Grimmel, the dragon hunter. Visually, he is a total opposite of Stoick and Drago. They were massive and dark-haired where Grimmel is skinny and light-haired. Where the previous antagonists were the kind to barrel in with brute force, Grimmel is calm and calculating. He uses ingenuity rather than force. And he always seems to be one step ahead of everyone else. He was a fitting villain for this final chapter.
The highlight of all three films is the relationship between Hiccup and Toothless. That is no different this time. Their playful banter is the heart of the film. And Toothless is as endearing as ever, especially when he is trying so hard to woo the Light Fury. She is an interesting character, although we never get much of her personality.
Also good is the continuing relationship between Hiccup and Astrid. Gobber awkwardly tries to move them along toward matrimony. Valka wisely encourages Astrid to help and stand by Hiccup when all is going wrong.
Lastly, The Hidden World is beautiful. The visuals in this one are simply amazing. Whether we are in the midst of a fight or other action scene or flying through the hidden world, the details are incredible. And the world is so rich with details, many of which are the "blink and you'll miss it" kind. It's definitely a film to experience on the big screen.
I won't spoil the ending (although if you watch the trailers, you can figure out what is bound to happen). Suffice it to say, the ending is perfect. Completely perfect.
The film is rated PG for pretty much the same reasons as the previous one.
How to Train Your Dragon: The Hidden World is a fun, beautiful, and exciting film. And although it isn't perfect, it is still a fitting finale to a beloved trilogy. I definitely recommend it. And stay through the credits. The first part has scenes from Hiccup and Toothless' friendship from all three movies. Then the scrolling credits have fun animated drawings that fit with each department (e.g., I roughly drawn viking painting a landscape for the Backgrounds crew). There isn't a scene at the end; the credits are just fun.
*** Spoiler Section ***
From the first scene on Berk, we quickly realize that Hiccup has created an enjoyable, but ultimately unsustainable society. There are dragons everywhere. Big dragons knocking over buildings. Small dragons getting in the stew. Happy as the Berk vikings may be, their way of life cannot continue on its current trajectory. It's a good setup, one that makes the ending -- though heartbreaking -- unavoidable.
I wish the trailers hadn't made the ending so clear. They made it fairly obvious that the trilogy would end with Hiccup and Toothless having to part ways. While the ending still tugs at the heartstrings and gets some eye allergies going, it lost some of its impact by being a foregone confusion before even the previews roll. Perhaps it was meant to soften the blow? I think audiences can be trusted more than that.
Apparently, Drago (the villain from the second film) was supposed to return for this film. He was decidedly not killed off at the end of the movie; he simply disappeared. (Although we know where his alpha dragon went, which was a nice touch.) Drago would have returned and ultimately have been redeemed. But, the studio decided that would take too much additional time and the story line was scrapped. Too bad.
Even without that, the finale of The Hidden World is perfect. It is then wonderful to see (new) Berk rebuilt with buildings paying homage to their dragons. It's also fun to see Hiccup and Astrid finish growing up and get married. And it's awesome to see them, years later, take their children to reconnect with Toothless and his family. I cannot think of a better way to end the trilogy.
I really liked the movie. And if you liked the previous installments, you should definitely go see it. Take the family and see it. Enjoy one more flight with Hiccup and Toothless.
That said, the movie has its flaws. And there were a few things that were disappointing. Let's get those out of the way so we can get back to what was good.
I like all three How to Train Your Dragon movies. But let's face it, they all have a rather similar plot: someone wants to kill/enslave dragons, Hiccup tries to stop them, Hiccup fails, Toothless is captured, Hiccup goes through character growth in order to save Toothless and everybody else, Toothless does something awesome, the enemy is thwarted. Yes, there are variations. But that sums up all three movies.
I've never understood the point of characters who are purposefully annoying. Snotlout, Ruffnut, and Tuffnut are actually more annoying in this film (Fishlegs is fine and likable). The trilogy has covered six years; how have none of them matured even the slightest bit? Ruffnut and his beard and advice get old really quickly. And I'm not entirely sure what was up between Snotlout, Eret, and Valka.
Which leads me to another point. We get a lot of Hiccup's peers, but not very much of Eret or Valka, both of whom are far more interesting. Eret is basically in the movie for two reasons: 1) to offer backstory for the villain, and 2) because he is voiced by Kit Harrington who is now fairly famous thanks to his role in Game of Thrones. Valka at least has a bit more to do, and it does make sense for her to still be rather awkward in her relationship with Hiccup.
My biggest grievance with the film was the music. The first movie has an amazing soundtrack with all sorts of epic and exciting themes. The second movie carried those over. I kept waiting for them in the third movie ... and they kept not coming. The music isn't bad, but it isn't the epic music I wanted. It seemed like only one theme was reused, and not until the third act. Why?!
Sorry, enough complaints.
One thing I really liked in this film was Grimmel, the dragon hunter. Visually, he is a total opposite of Stoick and Drago. They were massive and dark-haired where Grimmel is skinny and light-haired. Where the previous antagonists were the kind to barrel in with brute force, Grimmel is calm and calculating. He uses ingenuity rather than force. And he always seems to be one step ahead of everyone else. He was a fitting villain for this final chapter.
The highlight of all three films is the relationship between Hiccup and Toothless. That is no different this time. Their playful banter is the heart of the film. And Toothless is as endearing as ever, especially when he is trying so hard to woo the Light Fury. She is an interesting character, although we never get much of her personality.
Also good is the continuing relationship between Hiccup and Astrid. Gobber awkwardly tries to move them along toward matrimony. Valka wisely encourages Astrid to help and stand by Hiccup when all is going wrong.
Lastly, The Hidden World is beautiful. The visuals in this one are simply amazing. Whether we are in the midst of a fight or other action scene or flying through the hidden world, the details are incredible. And the world is so rich with details, many of which are the "blink and you'll miss it" kind. It's definitely a film to experience on the big screen.
I won't spoil the ending (although if you watch the trailers, you can figure out what is bound to happen). Suffice it to say, the ending is perfect. Completely perfect.
The film is rated PG for pretty much the same reasons as the previous one.
How to Train Your Dragon: The Hidden World is a fun, beautiful, and exciting film. And although it isn't perfect, it is still a fitting finale to a beloved trilogy. I definitely recommend it. And stay through the credits. The first part has scenes from Hiccup and Toothless' friendship from all three movies. Then the scrolling credits have fun animated drawings that fit with each department (e.g., I roughly drawn viking painting a landscape for the Backgrounds crew). There isn't a scene at the end; the credits are just fun.
*** Spoiler Section ***
From the first scene on Berk, we quickly realize that Hiccup has created an enjoyable, but ultimately unsustainable society. There are dragons everywhere. Big dragons knocking over buildings. Small dragons getting in the stew. Happy as the Berk vikings may be, their way of life cannot continue on its current trajectory. It's a good setup, one that makes the ending -- though heartbreaking -- unavoidable.
I wish the trailers hadn't made the ending so clear. They made it fairly obvious that the trilogy would end with Hiccup and Toothless having to part ways. While the ending still tugs at the heartstrings and gets some eye allergies going, it lost some of its impact by being a foregone confusion before even the previews roll. Perhaps it was meant to soften the blow? I think audiences can be trusted more than that.
Apparently, Drago (the villain from the second film) was supposed to return for this film. He was decidedly not killed off at the end of the movie; he simply disappeared. (Although we know where his alpha dragon went, which was a nice touch.) Drago would have returned and ultimately have been redeemed. But, the studio decided that would take too much additional time and the story line was scrapped. Too bad.
Even without that, the finale of The Hidden World is perfect. It is then wonderful to see (new) Berk rebuilt with buildings paying homage to their dragons. It's also fun to see Hiccup and Astrid finish growing up and get married. And it's awesome to see them, years later, take their children to reconnect with Toothless and his family. I cannot think of a better way to end the trilogy.
Quotable Quotes
- "There were dragons, when I was a boy." -- Hiccup
- "It's you and me, bud. Always." -- Hiccup to Toothless
- "Not a word." -- Hiccup, after having been knocked off Toothless by the Light Fury
- "I feel like I'm always asking this, but is there an actual plan?" -- Gobber to Hiccup
- "You need to lose the limp." "I have a prosthetic leg!" -- Ruffnut and Hiccup
- "So, what are you going to do about it?" "Probably something stupid." "That's the Hiccup I know." -- Astrid and Hiccup
13 February 2019
The LEGO Movie 2: The Second Part
Year: 2019
Director: Mike Mitchell
Starring: Chris Pratt, Elizabeth Banks, Will Arnett, Tiffany Haddish, and Stephanie Beatriz
Tagline: They come in pieces
Starring: Chris Pratt, Elizabeth Banks, Will Arnett, Tiffany Haddish, and Stephanie Beatriz
Tagline: They come in pieces
Synopsis: Five years after the first movie, everything is not awesome in Bricksburg, now Apocalypseburg. When a mysterious visitor kidnaps his friends, Emmett must set out to rescue them before Our-Mom-Ageddon.
Review
Frenetic: fast and energetic in a rather wild and uncontrolled way. Also, the word that best describes The LEGO Movie 2.
Like its predecessor, LM2 is a wild ride of pop culture references, colorful animation, and catchy songs. It's funny and enjoyable, and requires multiple viewings to catch it all. The animation is still top notch. Kids will love it. Adults will likely find plenty of things to enjoy (such as a certain air duct cameo).
Also like the first movie, the film has a real world story that ties in. That story is good, and has a satisfactory, makes-ya-smile conclusion. The only problem with it is that it isn't a surprise this time. The first movie only hinted that there was a reality outside of the LEGO world. So when real world Will Ferrell walked down the stairs, the entire movie changed and was put into a new perspective. This movie didn't have the chance for such a dramatic reveal. As clever as the "Sis-star System" is, we always knew where this would lead and how it would likely wrap up. It was emotionally satisfying, but it didn't have the same impact as the first movie.
I did enjoy LM2. It is funny and at times quite clever. But the entire time I was comparing it to the first movie, and it simply couldn't compare. The satirical elements and self-referential jokes were there, but they weren't as on point. The "Catchy Tune" was no worse musically than "Everything Is Awesome," but it had no substance. OK, "Everything Is Awesome" isn't really substantive, but it relayed a lot about who Emmett was and the world he lived in. So it fit the story. "Catchy Tune" is a hollow song simply designed to "get stuck inside your head." And it does.
The first film also had clear themes. It was about the reconciliation of a father and son; about learning to work together, which sometimes means following "the instructions"; and that we all have unique traits that can make us "special" as we use them to contribute to the team.
This film is about, um, being yourself ... so long as being yourself is in line with everyone else and involves glitter and sparkles and catchy pop tunes. No, that can't be it. It's about how we all need to toughen up and be brooding and cynical, because that couldn't possibly backfire and be disastrous. Hmm. It's about how we shouldn't end up cynical and brooding ... that we should all be kumbaya happy and just get along ... that females can be just as horrible communicators as males ... I'm not really sure what the moral of the story is. I guess it's that brothers and sisters should learn to get along and that they shouldn't leave LEGOs on the floor.
I know, that's a bit harsh. Perhaps my expectations were too high after the first movie. But while LM2 is fun and enjoyable, it's about as empty as its "Catchy Tune."
The film is rated PG for pretty much the same reasons as the first one.
The LEGO Movie 2 is a fun, wild ride of a movie. It's very funny. And the human storyline has heart. Go see it. Take the kiddos to see it. Just don't have expectations that it will be as good as the first movie.
*** Spoiler Section ***
Time travel is always tricky. I did love all the time machines Rex stole parts from in order to make his own. And I loved that it was in the shape of a destructive fist. But the time-space continuum logic there at the end ... I don't think it quite worked. Maybe it does. It's making my head hurt to try and figure it out.
My biggest gripe with LM2 started in the trailers. General Mayhem breaks in and asks who the fiercest warrior is. Lucy tells about how Emmett saved the world. But then Mayhem points out that Lucy did all the building and fighting, and they leave it there with Emmett coming across as the hapless male (which he kinda sorta is). At no point (that I recall) do they remember how Emmett was the one who brought them all together to work as a team and that without him, none of what Lucy did would have mattered. Moreover, all the other Bricksburg citizens have forgotten how to be special and work together. And never once is it mentioned that Emmett sacrificed his life to save his friends and all of Bricksburg. Lucy is great. And she does a lot of great things and is a likable character. But undermining what Emmett did does not somehow make her more heroic by the contrast. (That's a part of Hollywood "feminism" I can't stand. <gets off soapbox>)
Like its predecessor, LM2 is a wild ride of pop culture references, colorful animation, and catchy songs. It's funny and enjoyable, and requires multiple viewings to catch it all. The animation is still top notch. Kids will love it. Adults will likely find plenty of things to enjoy (such as a certain air duct cameo).
Also like the first movie, the film has a real world story that ties in. That story is good, and has a satisfactory, makes-ya-smile conclusion. The only problem with it is that it isn't a surprise this time. The first movie only hinted that there was a reality outside of the LEGO world. So when real world Will Ferrell walked down the stairs, the entire movie changed and was put into a new perspective. This movie didn't have the chance for such a dramatic reveal. As clever as the "Sis-star System" is, we always knew where this would lead and how it would likely wrap up. It was emotionally satisfying, but it didn't have the same impact as the first movie.
I did enjoy LM2. It is funny and at times quite clever. But the entire time I was comparing it to the first movie, and it simply couldn't compare. The satirical elements and self-referential jokes were there, but they weren't as on point. The "Catchy Tune" was no worse musically than "Everything Is Awesome," but it had no substance. OK, "Everything Is Awesome" isn't really substantive, but it relayed a lot about who Emmett was and the world he lived in. So it fit the story. "Catchy Tune" is a hollow song simply designed to "get stuck inside your head." And it does.
The first film also had clear themes. It was about the reconciliation of a father and son; about learning to work together, which sometimes means following "the instructions"; and that we all have unique traits that can make us "special" as we use them to contribute to the team.
This film is about, um, being yourself ... so long as being yourself is in line with everyone else and involves glitter and sparkles and catchy pop tunes. No, that can't be it. It's about how we all need to toughen up and be brooding and cynical, because that couldn't possibly backfire and be disastrous. Hmm. It's about how we shouldn't end up cynical and brooding ... that we should all be kumbaya happy and just get along ... that females can be just as horrible communicators as males ... I'm not really sure what the moral of the story is. I guess it's that brothers and sisters should learn to get along and that they shouldn't leave LEGOs on the floor.
I know, that's a bit harsh. Perhaps my expectations were too high after the first movie. But while LM2 is fun and enjoyable, it's about as empty as its "Catchy Tune."
The film is rated PG for pretty much the same reasons as the first one.
The LEGO Movie 2 is a fun, wild ride of a movie. It's very funny. And the human storyline has heart. Go see it. Take the kiddos to see it. Just don't have expectations that it will be as good as the first movie.
*** Spoiler Section ***
Time travel is always tricky. I did love all the time machines Rex stole parts from in order to make his own. And I loved that it was in the shape of a destructive fist. But the time-space continuum logic there at the end ... I don't think it quite worked. Maybe it does. It's making my head hurt to try and figure it out.
My biggest gripe with LM2 started in the trailers. General Mayhem breaks in and asks who the fiercest warrior is. Lucy tells about how Emmett saved the world. But then Mayhem points out that Lucy did all the building and fighting, and they leave it there with Emmett coming across as the hapless male (which he kinda sorta is). At no point (that I recall) do they remember how Emmett was the one who brought them all together to work as a team and that without him, none of what Lucy did would have mattered. Moreover, all the other Bricksburg citizens have forgotten how to be special and work together. And never once is it mentioned that Emmett sacrificed his life to save his friends and all of Bricksburg. Lucy is great. And she does a lot of great things and is a likable character. But undermining what Emmett did does not somehow make her more heroic by the contrast. (That's a part of Hollywood "feminism" I can't stand. <gets off soapbox>)
Quotable Quotes
- "With Batman gone and Marvel not returning our calls ..." -- Gandalf
- "Emmett! Did you draw stubble dots on your face?" "What? No." -- Lucy and Emmett
- "Behold, the Sis-star System." "Whooooa!" "No 'whoas'! Do not giver her the satisfaction of whoaing this." "Ooooohhh!" "That's even worse." "Ahhhh!" "Stop it!" -- General Mayhem, Unikitty, Metal Beard, Batman, Benny, and Lucy
- "Bruce Willis?" "I, uh, spend a lot of time in air ducts." -- Lucy and Bruce Willis
01 February 2019
The Kid Who Would Be King
Year: 2019
Director: Joe Cornish
Starring: Louis Ashbourne Serkis, Dean Chaumoo, Tom Taylor, Rhianna Dorris, Angus Imrie, Patrick Stewart, and Rebecca Ferguson
Tagline: Evil gets schooled
Starring: Louis Ashbourne Serkis, Dean Chaumoo, Tom Taylor, Rhianna Dorris, Angus Imrie, Patrick Stewart, and Rebecca Ferguson
Tagline: Evil gets schooled
Synopsis: While running away from bullies, Alexander finds a sword in a stone and pulls it out. Soon Merlin arrives to tell him it is up to him and his friends to save the world from the return of Morgana (King Arthur's evil half-sister).
Review
This isn't a widely known movie. Which is too bad, because it is really enjoyable and a good family film.
The story is a modern reimagining of the Arthur legends. The film even begins by recounting the applicable stories about King Arthur through an animated storybook sequence. Cut to the modern day world where history is about to repeat itself and a new hero must arise.
The film has a good story with some clever dialogue and relatable characters. It also has a timely message about working together. In his quest, Alexander enlists the help of two bullies who constantly pick on him and his friend. He sees their potential as allies and they slowly learn to get along and then work together. By the end, enemies have become friends. And because it is so tied up into the narrative, the moral never feels heavy handed. Each character also has their own arc where they have to learn and grow and overcome their weaknesses.
The actors playing the kids all do a good job. Young Merlin was a bit odd, but then that was what they were going for. His quirkiness worked for a medieval person in modern day Britain. But I found myself more drawn to Merlin when he was older and portrayed by Patrick Stewart.
It is fairly clear that The Kid Who Would Be King didn't have a blockbuster budget to work with. The visuals aren't bad, but they are limited. One interesting segment involves some obligatory training for the young heroes. It's like they weren't taught to wield a sword in middle school or something. What's fun about the scene is that they are fighting against, and being taught by, trees. Not talking trees, just moving trees with lots of branches. The animation at the beginning was also quite good.
About the only thing I didn't like about the movie was the musical score. It was merely adequate. The film deserved a more epic soundtrack. The one it got felt more like the temp track used while the real score was being written.
The film is rated PG for some action (mostly the destruction of flaming skeletons) and mild peril (mostly from flaming skeletons ... and a dragon). I don't recall any swearing. We do see young Merlin without clothes on. But it is from a distance and there is a convenient layer of low fog obscuring his behind.
Ultimately, The Kid Who Would Be King is a story about people (in this case kids) coming together to right that which is wrong and triumph over the things that would otherwise destroy our world. It's a timely message in a fun film. It may not be an instant classic, but it's worth watching.
*** Spoiler Section ***
The false climax and aftermath both worked and didn't work. It worked within the story itself. But if you'd seen any of the trailers, you knew some very important scenes hadn't yet happened.
Although I liked how the movie wrapped up -- it was quite fitting for the story and the moral -- I did want to know a bit more about the battle's aftermath. Was everything magically cleaned up? Don't any of the other school kids have a million questions?
The story is a modern reimagining of the Arthur legends. The film even begins by recounting the applicable stories about King Arthur through an animated storybook sequence. Cut to the modern day world where history is about to repeat itself and a new hero must arise.
The film has a good story with some clever dialogue and relatable characters. It also has a timely message about working together. In his quest, Alexander enlists the help of two bullies who constantly pick on him and his friend. He sees their potential as allies and they slowly learn to get along and then work together. By the end, enemies have become friends. And because it is so tied up into the narrative, the moral never feels heavy handed. Each character also has their own arc where they have to learn and grow and overcome their weaknesses.
The actors playing the kids all do a good job. Young Merlin was a bit odd, but then that was what they were going for. His quirkiness worked for a medieval person in modern day Britain. But I found myself more drawn to Merlin when he was older and portrayed by Patrick Stewart.
It is fairly clear that The Kid Who Would Be King didn't have a blockbuster budget to work with. The visuals aren't bad, but they are limited. One interesting segment involves some obligatory training for the young heroes. It's like they weren't taught to wield a sword in middle school or something. What's fun about the scene is that they are fighting against, and being taught by, trees. Not talking trees, just moving trees with lots of branches. The animation at the beginning was also quite good.
About the only thing I didn't like about the movie was the musical score. It was merely adequate. The film deserved a more epic soundtrack. The one it got felt more like the temp track used while the real score was being written.
The film is rated PG for some action (mostly the destruction of flaming skeletons) and mild peril (mostly from flaming skeletons ... and a dragon). I don't recall any swearing. We do see young Merlin without clothes on. But it is from a distance and there is a convenient layer of low fog obscuring his behind.
Ultimately, The Kid Who Would Be King is a story about people (in this case kids) coming together to right that which is wrong and triumph over the things that would otherwise destroy our world. It's a timely message in a fun film. It may not be an instant classic, but it's worth watching.
*** Spoiler Section ***
The false climax and aftermath both worked and didn't work. It worked within the story itself. But if you'd seen any of the trailers, you knew some very important scenes hadn't yet happened.
Although I liked how the movie wrapped up -- it was quite fitting for the story and the moral -- I did want to know a bit more about the battle's aftermath. Was everything magically cleaned up? Don't any of the other school kids have a million questions?
Quotable Quotes
- "Where did you learn how to drive?" "Mario Kart." -- Bedders and Kaye
- "We're the knights of the round table!" "You are such a nerd." Alexander and Kaye
- "All hail the king!" "Don't, it's just embarrassing." -- Lance (kneeling) and Alexander
- "We are history. They are the future!" -- Merlin to Morgana
07 January 2019
Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse
Year: 2018
Directors: Bob Persichetti, Peter Ramsey, and Rodney Rothman
Starring: Shameik Moore, Jake Johnson, Hailee Steinfeld, Mahershala Ali, Brian Tyree Henry, Lily Tomlin, Zoe Kravitz, Chris Pine, Liev Schreiber, Nicolas Cage, and John Mulaney
Tagline: Enter a universe where more than one wears the mask.
Starring: Shameik Moore, Jake Johnson, Hailee Steinfeld, Mahershala Ali, Brian Tyree Henry, Lily Tomlin, Zoe Kravitz, Chris Pine, Liev Schreiber, Nicolas Cage, and John Mulaney
Tagline: Enter a universe where more than one wears the mask.
Synopsis: Miles Morales finds himself as the new Spider-Man. With the help of other Spider-People from other dimensions, Miles fights to save his world and all the others.
Review
I'm not sure how to go about this review. Rotten Tomatoes has this film at 97% fresh. A few people I've talked to have called it the best Spider-Man movie yet. It just won the Golden Globe for Best Motion Picture -- Animated. It's a well made, boundary pushing movie.
I didn't like it.
I acknowledge that it is a good movie. The action is impressive. The voice cast fits. The animation is new and bold. And the story went in all sorts of new directions.
For one thing, I only sorta liked the animation. It did feel like a comic book (graphic novel, whatever). But I didn't like that it was sometimes blurry or fuzzy in places. And at times there was simply too much going on. In a comic book, you are limited to one page at a time and can absorb it at your own pace. This was too much, too quickly, and all over the place at times. Not all the time. But sometimes.
The film is certainly funny. I liked the initial voice-over intro by Spider-Man which acknowledges and pays tribute to the various previous film incarnations (including the infamous emo walk in Spider-Man 3). There are lots of other funny lines and moments. Spider-Man Noir and Spider-Ham are interesting and amusing characters based on their very existence. But again, they just seemed like too much.
Which leads to the main reason I personally didn't like it. I just don't like all the multi-universe, multi-dimension stuff. It's why I don't actually like comic books. I prefer straightforward stories with a beginning, a middle, and an end (like Harry Potter, Lord of the Rings, or Christopher Nolan's Batman movies). For me, there is only one Spider-Man, and that's Peter Parker. That's me and my preferences. For a long time I wasn't even going to see Into the Spider-Verse, but it got such good reviews I thought I'd give it a try. I enjoyed elements, but on the whole I just didn't like it.
That's probably not a very helpful review. If you love comic books and love Spider-Man, you will probably enjoy it. Like I said, it's a good movie, although not without some plot holes.
The film is rated PG and has typical superhero violence including the deaths of various characters.
*** Spoiler Section ***
Everyone in the city finds out that Peter Parker was Spider-Man. Which means they also know that Aunt May was his aunt. So whether Miles was tracked or not, it makes sense for the bad guys to go straight for Aunt May's house. Also, how in the world did they build that underground lab without any of the neighbors noticing? And could they really afford that off of Spidey's merchandising?
Another thing that bothered me was how Miles felt guilt for his Uncle Aaron's death. His uncle was the Prowler, a villain subordinate of Kingpin. We saw two entire scenes where the Prowler was bent on killing Spider-Man (both of them, any of them?). And he goes about it in a way that shows this isn't his first time. Of course Miles feels sorrow for his uncle's death. Of course he still loves his uncle. But Aaron's death came at the hands of Kingpin and because he made choices that led him down a dangerous and deadly path. Maybe Miles could have helped him back to the light. Maybe. But clearly Aaron was in too deep and Kingpin didn't hesitate when Aaron did. None of that is on Miles.
I don't know much about the villain Kingpin, but I was under the impression he is a pretty smart guy. His plot in the film is not very smart. Yes, it is driven by emotion and loss. But is he really so grief-stricken that he thinks he can rip his other dimensional wife and son from their own dimension and somehow make them happy in his own? Does he think that somehow this time he could hide who he really is from them? It seems like someone who has gone that far down the mental rabbit hole would not be able to keep up appearances in the rest of his life. But maybe that is simply the Kingpin character.
Lastly, although it works for the scene, I'd think it would be emotionally difficult for Mary Jane to be in a room with so many people dressed as her recently deceased husband, tribute or not.
I didn't like it.
I acknowledge that it is a good movie. The action is impressive. The voice cast fits. The animation is new and bold. And the story went in all sorts of new directions.
For one thing, I only sorta liked the animation. It did feel like a comic book (graphic novel, whatever). But I didn't like that it was sometimes blurry or fuzzy in places. And at times there was simply too much going on. In a comic book, you are limited to one page at a time and can absorb it at your own pace. This was too much, too quickly, and all over the place at times. Not all the time. But sometimes.
The film is certainly funny. I liked the initial voice-over intro by Spider-Man which acknowledges and pays tribute to the various previous film incarnations (including the infamous emo walk in Spider-Man 3). There are lots of other funny lines and moments. Spider-Man Noir and Spider-Ham are interesting and amusing characters based on their very existence. But again, they just seemed like too much.
Which leads to the main reason I personally didn't like it. I just don't like all the multi-universe, multi-dimension stuff. It's why I don't actually like comic books. I prefer straightforward stories with a beginning, a middle, and an end (like Harry Potter, Lord of the Rings, or Christopher Nolan's Batman movies). For me, there is only one Spider-Man, and that's Peter Parker. That's me and my preferences. For a long time I wasn't even going to see Into the Spider-Verse, but it got such good reviews I thought I'd give it a try. I enjoyed elements, but on the whole I just didn't like it.
That's probably not a very helpful review. If you love comic books and love Spider-Man, you will probably enjoy it. Like I said, it's a good movie, although not without some plot holes.
The film is rated PG and has typical superhero violence including the deaths of various characters.
*** Spoiler Section ***
Everyone in the city finds out that Peter Parker was Spider-Man. Which means they also know that Aunt May was his aunt. So whether Miles was tracked or not, it makes sense for the bad guys to go straight for Aunt May's house. Also, how in the world did they build that underground lab without any of the neighbors noticing? And could they really afford that off of Spidey's merchandising?
Another thing that bothered me was how Miles felt guilt for his Uncle Aaron's death. His uncle was the Prowler, a villain subordinate of Kingpin. We saw two entire scenes where the Prowler was bent on killing Spider-Man (both of them, any of them?). And he goes about it in a way that shows this isn't his first time. Of course Miles feels sorrow for his uncle's death. Of course he still loves his uncle. But Aaron's death came at the hands of Kingpin and because he made choices that led him down a dangerous and deadly path. Maybe Miles could have helped him back to the light. Maybe. But clearly Aaron was in too deep and Kingpin didn't hesitate when Aaron did. None of that is on Miles.
I don't know much about the villain Kingpin, but I was under the impression he is a pretty smart guy. His plot in the film is not very smart. Yes, it is driven by emotion and loss. But is he really so grief-stricken that he thinks he can rip his other dimensional wife and son from their own dimension and somehow make them happy in his own? Does he think that somehow this time he could hide who he really is from them? It seems like someone who has gone that far down the mental rabbit hole would not be able to keep up appearances in the rest of his life. But maybe that is simply the Kingpin character.
Lastly, although it works for the scene, I'd think it would be emotionally difficult for Mary Jane to be in a room with so many people dressed as her recently deceased husband, tribute or not.
Quotable Quotes
- "Hey, fellas." "Is he in black and white?" "Where is that wind coming from? We're in a basement." "Wherever I go, the wind follows." -- Spider-Man Noir, Miles, and Peter
- "Do animals talk in this dimension? 'Cause I don't wanna freak anyone out." -- Spider-Ham
- "With great power comes great --" "Don't you dare finish that sentence! Don't do it. I'm sick of it." -- Miles and Peter
- "I have an excellent theme song and a so-so popsicle." -- Peter
05 January 2019
Aquaman
Year: 2018
Director: James Wan
Starring: Jason Momoa, Amber Heard, Willem Dafoe, Patrick Wilson, Nicole Kidman, Dolph Lundgren, and Yahya Abdul-Mateen II
Tagline: Home is calling
Starring: Jason Momoa, Amber Heard, Willem Dafoe, Patrick Wilson, Nicole Kidman, Dolph Lundgren, and Yahya Abdul-Mateen II
Tagline: Home is calling
Synopsis: Arthur Curry is half human and half Atlantean. When both worlds are in danger, he must find his path as hero and king.
Review
Arthur Curry (aka Aquaman) was one of the best parts in Justice League, so I was pleased but hesitant when I saw that he was getting a solo film. Is it perfect? Nah. Is it a whole lot of fun? You betcha! Unlike the Batman and Superman films of the DCEU (DC comics extended universe), Aquaman is fun, bright, and wise enough to never take itself too seriously.
One thing the DCEU has struggled with has been the "grim dark" nature of the Batman and Superman led films. Wonder Woman went against that trend and was a terrific movie. Aquaman followed the same path. The visuals are bright, colorful, and unlike any movies I can recall seeing. Atlantis is stunning to behold. It's also neat to see underwater fights. I'm not sure how believable those fights are, but then nothing in this film really tries to be too believable.
And that's part of what makes Aquaman so enjoyable. It's fun. It's funny. It doesn't go into the territory of campiness. It's not a parody. But the film does recognize this is a movie about a hero who can talk to fish. So it rolls with that. The closest it comes to being over the top is right before a dramatic duel in the Ring of Fire (<insert Finding Nemo joke here>). As you might expect, a big ceremonial duel for the throne is accompanied by ceremonial drums. And those drums are played by a very large octopus. Because why not? It's a quick, "wait, did I really see that" moment that doesn't overstay its welcome.
Arthur and Mera are also great with the one liners and have a good banter.
I liked the various characters. Jason Momoa (Arthur Curry) proves he is a big enough personality to helm his own film. Amber Heard (Mera) is a fitting partner for him, and it is fun to see her character as a fish out of water. Orm (Arthur's half brother) is a pretty standard villain, but he does have reasonable cause to dislike us surface dwellers. Black Manta is the other villain and he is a formidable foe indeed. I also liked Tom Curry and Atlanna and their relationship.
Oddly enough, this is the second movie during the holiday season that featured actor Dolph Lundgren. In Aquaman he plays King Nereus. In the Rocky/Creed movies he is Ivan Drago.
The film also features one of my new favorite cameos. It's uncredited, and if I hadn't known who it was beforehand, I might not have picked it up. But since I did know, I could hear the real voice within the highly edited ("monsterized") voice of the Karathen. Who voices the enormous, tentacled sea monster? That would be none other than Julie Andrews. And it works. It works so well.
As for the story, it is the typical superhero origin movie. I felt there were enough new elements to keep it fresh though. And, despite some plot holes, the story works fairly well.
Lastly, I enjoyed the music. The soundtrack was good. It was a little different, but it totally fit the tone of the film. And there were a few well-placed songs.
Aquaman is visually spectacular and a fun time at the movies. So grab some popcorn and hang on for the underwater ride. Be sure to stay for a mid-credits scene.
The film is rated PG-13 for typical superhero violence and a number of s-words and a-words.
*** Spoiler Section ***
The final battle is pretty epic. I'm trying to think of another movie with a great undersea battle. Nothing is coming to mind. But Aquaman has people, aquatic ships, sea creatures, sea animals, and a Karathen all going at it. Again, the characters are wholly invested in the battle. But the movie itself acknowledges its own silliness. Name one other movie where someone gets skewered by a narwhal.
I would also like to point out that it sure is lucky nobody ever knocked over or damaged that statue of Romulus over the course of hundreds of years. All the others seemed to have fared poorly, but good old Romulus was preserved.
One thing the DCEU has struggled with has been the "grim dark" nature of the Batman and Superman led films. Wonder Woman went against that trend and was a terrific movie. Aquaman followed the same path. The visuals are bright, colorful, and unlike any movies I can recall seeing. Atlantis is stunning to behold. It's also neat to see underwater fights. I'm not sure how believable those fights are, but then nothing in this film really tries to be too believable.
And that's part of what makes Aquaman so enjoyable. It's fun. It's funny. It doesn't go into the territory of campiness. It's not a parody. But the film does recognize this is a movie about a hero who can talk to fish. So it rolls with that. The closest it comes to being over the top is right before a dramatic duel in the Ring of Fire (<insert Finding Nemo joke here>). As you might expect, a big ceremonial duel for the throne is accompanied by ceremonial drums. And those drums are played by a very large octopus. Because why not? It's a quick, "wait, did I really see that" moment that doesn't overstay its welcome.
Arthur and Mera are also great with the one liners and have a good banter.
I liked the various characters. Jason Momoa (Arthur Curry) proves he is a big enough personality to helm his own film. Amber Heard (Mera) is a fitting partner for him, and it is fun to see her character as a fish out of water. Orm (Arthur's half brother) is a pretty standard villain, but he does have reasonable cause to dislike us surface dwellers. Black Manta is the other villain and he is a formidable foe indeed. I also liked Tom Curry and Atlanna and their relationship.
Oddly enough, this is the second movie during the holiday season that featured actor Dolph Lundgren. In Aquaman he plays King Nereus. In the Rocky/Creed movies he is Ivan Drago.
The film also features one of my new favorite cameos. It's uncredited, and if I hadn't known who it was beforehand, I might not have picked it up. But since I did know, I could hear the real voice within the highly edited ("monsterized") voice of the Karathen. Who voices the enormous, tentacled sea monster? That would be none other than Julie Andrews. And it works. It works so well.
As for the story, it is the typical superhero origin movie. I felt there were enough new elements to keep it fresh though. And, despite some plot holes, the story works fairly well.
Lastly, I enjoyed the music. The soundtrack was good. It was a little different, but it totally fit the tone of the film. And there were a few well-placed songs.
Aquaman is visually spectacular and a fun time at the movies. So grab some popcorn and hang on for the underwater ride. Be sure to stay for a mid-credits scene.
The film is rated PG-13 for typical superhero violence and a number of s-words and a-words.
*** Spoiler Section ***
The final battle is pretty epic. I'm trying to think of another movie with a great undersea battle. Nothing is coming to mind. But Aquaman has people, aquatic ships, sea creatures, sea animals, and a Karathen all going at it. Again, the characters are wholly invested in the battle. But the movie itself acknowledges its own silliness. Name one other movie where someone gets skewered by a narwhal.
I would also like to point out that it sure is lucky nobody ever knocked over or damaged that statue of Romulus over the course of hundreds of years. All the others seemed to have fared poorly, but good old Romulus was preserved.
Quotable Quotes
- "I am Atlanna, Queen of Atlantis." "I am Thomas, keeper of lighthouse." -- Atlanna and Tom
- "Bogey at six o'clock!" "What does that even mean?" "Enemy behind us!" "Why didn't you just say so?" -- Arthur and Mera
- "Wait! Shouldn't we have written it down?" "I memorized it. Didn't you?" "Uh, yeah." "What did it say?" "Something something trident." -- Arthur and Mera
- "You based our escape on a children's book [Pinocchio]?" "It's a book? No, I based it on the movie." -- Mera and Arthur
- "Atlantis has always had a king. Now it needs something more." "What could be greater than a king?" "A hero." "A king fights for his own people. A hero fights for everyone." -- Mera, Arthur, and Atlanna
01 January 2019
Mary Poppins Returns
Year: 2018
Director: Rob Marshall
Starring: Emily Blunt, Lin-Manuel Miranda, Ben Whishaw, Emily Mortimer, Julie Walters, Colin Firth, Meryl Streep, Dick Van Dyke, and Angela Lansbury
Tagline: When you lose your way, just remember the magic always returns
Starring: Emily Blunt, Lin-Manuel Miranda, Ben Whishaw, Emily Mortimer, Julie Walters, Colin Firth, Meryl Streep, Dick Van Dyke, and Angela Lansbury
Tagline: When you lose your way, just remember the magic always returns
Synopsis: Mary Poppins returns to 17 Cherry Tree Lane, this time to help the grown up Jane and Michael.
Review
As I'm sure was the case for many, I grew up watching Mary Poppins on VHS. When I heard they were making a sequel 50+ years later, I was dubious. So, how is Mary Poppins Returns? My takeaway is it is a fun-filled adventure worth seeing, even if it isn't as practically perfect as the original.
You simply can't watch Mary Poppins Returns without comparing it to its predecessor in two ways: the titular character and the story itself.
Emily Blunt is fantastic as the magical nanny. She fills the role perfectly. She doesn't pretend to be the Julie Andrews version. She is her own version. And both versions are wonderful.
As for the story, it is fun and magical. But it rides a bit too carefully on the coattails of the original. We hit all the same plot points: the introduction to magic, a scene with live action and animation intermixed, the visit to an eccentric relative, a mishap at the bank, a rousing song-and-dance number, and an uplifting ending. While most of those things work within the story and are indeed fun, it means the film doesn't bring much that is new.
What is new, however, is the addition of a villain and the ticking clock cliche. Again, neither is bad and both serve the story as it is. But the original film was able to pack an emotional punch and wrap up satisfactorily without either of those things.
I've already raved about Emily Blunt. The rest of the cast also do a good job. Lin-Manuel Miranda's Jack (a lamplighter) is charming through and through. Ben Whishaw brings the grown Michael Banks to life and takes a character that could have been too sentimental and keeps him grounded. Emily Mortimer is a believable grown up Jane. Julie Walters is excellent as Ellen the housekeeper (the same housekeeper character as in the original). Colin Firth and Meryl Streep both look like they are having a marvelous time in their respective roles. The kids do a good job, especially since I read that this was the youngest's first acting role.
Two other returning characters are Admiral Boom and his first mate, Mr. Binnacle. The admiral's little side story made me happy.
But what made me the happiest in the entire film was when Dick Van Dyke showed up for the climax. I could not suppress the grin on my face seeing him as Mr. Dawes Jr. (originally he was Mr. Dawes Sr.). Equally smile-worthy was seeing Angela Lansbury as the Balloon Lady in the finale. Seeing two Disney legends (and stars from my childhood) was fantastic.
As you would expect from the House of Mouse, the production values are top notch throughout. The costumes, the sets, the choreography, and all else are spot on. And the animated sequences are beautiful. I'm so glad the director insisted on using traditional, hand drawn animation, in keeping with the original. The colors are vibrant and the interaction with the live action characters is seamless.
And that leaves only the music. Most of the songs are indeed catchy (and may well get stuck in your head). But for me, most of the songs weren't as good or as truly memorable as those from the original. Those songs have become classics. These songs are nice. My personal favorites are "A Conversation," "Can You Imagine That?," and "The Place Where Lost Things Go." Still, it was when motifs from the original songs were interwoven into the score that I got most excited.
All told, Mary Poppins Returns is a worthy sequel. The film is full of wonderful small moments, some endearing songs, and plenty of nostalgia. Emily Blunt is terrific. I recommend taking yourself and your family to "trip a little light fantastic" with Mary Poppins, Jack, and all the others.
The film is rated PG for some mild peril.
*** Spoiler Section ***
As emotionally satisfying as the climax is, the deus ex machina doesn't really work when you think about it. Having Dawes Jr. explain how the tuppence from the first film are now rescuing them financially in this film is a lovely twist. But let's face it, even over 20 years with the wisest of investments, there's no way that tuppence (two pennies) are going to have grown into a substantial sum of money. That's not realistic during the best of economic times. And the film takes place during the early 1930s, i.e., anything but the best of economic times.
But why should logic and realism get in the way of a satisfying ending?
Seriously, though, it made me so happy when Admiral Boom and Big Ben were back in sync.
You simply can't watch Mary Poppins Returns without comparing it to its predecessor in two ways: the titular character and the story itself.
Emily Blunt is fantastic as the magical nanny. She fills the role perfectly. She doesn't pretend to be the Julie Andrews version. She is her own version. And both versions are wonderful.
As for the story, it is fun and magical. But it rides a bit too carefully on the coattails of the original. We hit all the same plot points: the introduction to magic, a scene with live action and animation intermixed, the visit to an eccentric relative, a mishap at the bank, a rousing song-and-dance number, and an uplifting ending. While most of those things work within the story and are indeed fun, it means the film doesn't bring much that is new.
What is new, however, is the addition of a villain and the ticking clock cliche. Again, neither is bad and both serve the story as it is. But the original film was able to pack an emotional punch and wrap up satisfactorily without either of those things.
I've already raved about Emily Blunt. The rest of the cast also do a good job. Lin-Manuel Miranda's Jack (a lamplighter) is charming through and through. Ben Whishaw brings the grown Michael Banks to life and takes a character that could have been too sentimental and keeps him grounded. Emily Mortimer is a believable grown up Jane. Julie Walters is excellent as Ellen the housekeeper (the same housekeeper character as in the original). Colin Firth and Meryl Streep both look like they are having a marvelous time in their respective roles. The kids do a good job, especially since I read that this was the youngest's first acting role.
Two other returning characters are Admiral Boom and his first mate, Mr. Binnacle. The admiral's little side story made me happy.
But what made me the happiest in the entire film was when Dick Van Dyke showed up for the climax. I could not suppress the grin on my face seeing him as Mr. Dawes Jr. (originally he was Mr. Dawes Sr.). Equally smile-worthy was seeing Angela Lansbury as the Balloon Lady in the finale. Seeing two Disney legends (and stars from my childhood) was fantastic.
As you would expect from the House of Mouse, the production values are top notch throughout. The costumes, the sets, the choreography, and all else are spot on. And the animated sequences are beautiful. I'm so glad the director insisted on using traditional, hand drawn animation, in keeping with the original. The colors are vibrant and the interaction with the live action characters is seamless.
And that leaves only the music. Most of the songs are indeed catchy (and may well get stuck in your head). But for me, most of the songs weren't as good or as truly memorable as those from the original. Those songs have become classics. These songs are nice. My personal favorites are "A Conversation," "Can You Imagine That?," and "The Place Where Lost Things Go." Still, it was when motifs from the original songs were interwoven into the score that I got most excited.
All told, Mary Poppins Returns is a worthy sequel. The film is full of wonderful small moments, some endearing songs, and plenty of nostalgia. Emily Blunt is terrific. I recommend taking yourself and your family to "trip a little light fantastic" with Mary Poppins, Jack, and all the others.
The film is rated PG for some mild peril.
*** Spoiler Section ***
As emotionally satisfying as the climax is, the deus ex machina doesn't really work when you think about it. Having Dawes Jr. explain how the tuppence from the first film are now rescuing them financially in this film is a lovely twist. But let's face it, even over 20 years with the wisest of investments, there's no way that tuppence (two pennies) are going to have grown into a substantial sum of money. That's not realistic during the best of economic times. And the film takes place during the early 1930s, i.e., anything but the best of economic times.
But why should logic and realism get in the way of a satisfying ending?
Seriously, though, it made me so happy when Admiral Boom and Big Ben were back in sync.
Quotable Quotes
- "I was flying a kite and it got caught on a nanny!" -- Georgie
- "Close your mouth, please, Michael. We are still not a codfish." -- Mary Poppins
- "She did come all this way on a kite." -- Michael to Jane
- "Cleaning is not a spectator sport." -- Mary Poppins
- "That's an interesting accent you've got. Where're you from?" "It's a long story --" "No one knows." -- Jack, Cousin Topsy, and Mary Poppins
ISFS
28 December 2018
Bumblebee
Year: 2018
Director: Travis Knight
Starring: Hailee Steinfeld, John Cena, Jorge Lendeborg Jr., John Ortiz, and Pamela Adlon
Tagline: Every adventure has a beginning
Starring: Hailee Steinfeld, John Cena, Jorge Lendeborg Jr., John Ortiz, and Pamela Adlon
Tagline: Every adventure has a beginning
Synopsis: His memories and voice gone, B-127 finds himself alone on earth until he makes friends with Charlie Watson. Renamed "Bumblebee," he must deal with old enemies if he wants to keep his new home and friends safe.
Review
As a kid, I had a bunch of Transformers toys. I had Jazz, Bumblebee, and, of course, Optimus Prime. Naturally, when the Transformers movie came out in 2007 I went to see it. And I hated it. Completely. I refused to see any of the subsequent films. And then I saw a trailer for Bumblebee. It immediately seemed like a different take on the robots in disguise. When the positive reviews started pouring in, I got more and more intrigued. So when I found out it was directed by the same fellow who directed Kubo and the Two Strings, I was sold on seeing it.
Forget all those other messes, Bumblebee is terrific!
Is it a perfect movie? No. In fact, if you were to break it down to its skeletal story, you've seen this movie before. You know these characters. Within 15 minutes, you could probably figure out every plot point and character arc for the rest of the film. Did I care about any of that when I was watching it? Not in the slightest. I was absolutely content to go for this joyful ride through 1987 with a battered yellow Volkswagen beetle.
The film rests on one thing: the relationship between Charlie Watson (perfectly portrayed by Hailee Steinfeld) and Bumblebee. The movie works because that relationship works. And that's saying something. Because Hailee was acting to nothing. And Bumblebee is mute for the majority of the movie. So, like WALL-E, Bumblebee's character and emotions have to be expressed through design and action. And the filmmakers do a fantastic job making this strange array of metal parts into a character we care about. He may be metal and wires, but Bumblebee has a very real heart. And when he bonds with Charlie, the rest of the film falls into place.
Also good was John Cena. He plays the typical military man who feels like he has to hunt down this dangerous alien invader. But he also has some of the most humorous lines in the movie and manages to make his character stand out from the cliche.
There's plenty of action throughout the film. It is mostly robots fighting other robots. But there were also plenty of quiet moments throughout the film that allowed for character growth and bonding.
The music for Bumblebee was also quite good. I loved the score. The soundtrack was also enjoyable. It served to ground the film in its 1987 setting. I didn't know all the songs, but I knew enough, which made it fun.
The film is rated PG-13 for action and some swearing (I honestly don't remember much). Most of the violence is between robots. A couple of humans also get killed in a way that is quick and gore-free (but gross if you think about it). It might be rather intense for younger viewers.
There are lots of movies to see this holiday season. So far, Bumblebee is my favorite. It's well-made, has just the right balance of action and heart, and it made me want to give a robot a hug (which hasn't happened since WALL-E). Be sure to stick around for the mid-credits scenes.
*** Spoiler Section ***
During the end scene, when Bumblebee's Camaro pulls up alongside a semi, I couldn't help but smile. And, sure enough, Optimus Prime is back for the mid-credits scene.
The first scene potentially sets up a sequel. But the best part is when Bumblebee uses his radio to tell Optimus his new name. Bumblebee has found his voice.
The second scene brings closure to Charlie's story. She has finally finished fixing and restoring her father's car. The scene says so much without a single word.
Forget all those other messes, Bumblebee is terrific!
Is it a perfect movie? No. In fact, if you were to break it down to its skeletal story, you've seen this movie before. You know these characters. Within 15 minutes, you could probably figure out every plot point and character arc for the rest of the film. Did I care about any of that when I was watching it? Not in the slightest. I was absolutely content to go for this joyful ride through 1987 with a battered yellow Volkswagen beetle.
The film rests on one thing: the relationship between Charlie Watson (perfectly portrayed by Hailee Steinfeld) and Bumblebee. The movie works because that relationship works. And that's saying something. Because Hailee was acting to nothing. And Bumblebee is mute for the majority of the movie. So, like WALL-E, Bumblebee's character and emotions have to be expressed through design and action. And the filmmakers do a fantastic job making this strange array of metal parts into a character we care about. He may be metal and wires, but Bumblebee has a very real heart. And when he bonds with Charlie, the rest of the film falls into place.
Also good was John Cena. He plays the typical military man who feels like he has to hunt down this dangerous alien invader. But he also has some of the most humorous lines in the movie and manages to make his character stand out from the cliche.
There's plenty of action throughout the film. It is mostly robots fighting other robots. But there were also plenty of quiet moments throughout the film that allowed for character growth and bonding.
The music for Bumblebee was also quite good. I loved the score. The soundtrack was also enjoyable. It served to ground the film in its 1987 setting. I didn't know all the songs, but I knew enough, which made it fun.
The film is rated PG-13 for action and some swearing (I honestly don't remember much). Most of the violence is between robots. A couple of humans also get killed in a way that is quick and gore-free (but gross if you think about it). It might be rather intense for younger viewers.
There are lots of movies to see this holiday season. So far, Bumblebee is my favorite. It's well-made, has just the right balance of action and heart, and it made me want to give a robot a hug (which hasn't happened since WALL-E). Be sure to stick around for the mid-credits scenes.
*** Spoiler Section ***
During the end scene, when Bumblebee's Camaro pulls up alongside a semi, I couldn't help but smile. And, sure enough, Optimus Prime is back for the mid-credits scene.
The first scene potentially sets up a sequel. But the best part is when Bumblebee uses his radio to tell Optimus his new name. Bumblebee has found his voice.
The second scene brings closure to Charlie's story. She has finally finished fixing and restoring her father's car. The scene says so much without a single word.
Quotable Quotes
- "Don't run! Do not run! ... She ran." -- Agent Burns
- "They literally call themselves 'Decepticons.' That doesn't set off any red flags?" -- Agent Burns
- "Wait. You mean you could have been a Camaro this whole time?" -- Charlie
ISFS
22 December 2018
Creed II
Year: 2018
Director: Steven Caple Jr.
Starring: Michael B. Jordan, Sylvester Stallone, Tessa Thompson, Phylicia Rashad, Dolph Lundgren, and Florian Munteanu
Starring: Michael B. Jordan, Sylvester Stallone, Tessa Thompson, Phylicia Rashad, Dolph Lundgren, and Florian Munteanu
Synopsis: Adonis Creed fights Viktor Drago so he can prove ... something or other.
Review
This wasn't a movie I wanted to see. But it was what was voted on by my team at work. And I'm grateful to work for a generous company and team where we can take part of the work day and go to a movie at Christmas.
If you like Rocky movies or liked the first Creed, I'm sure you'll like this one. I don't like those and I didn't like this. But that's me. I acknowledge that it was a good movie and a well-made movie. But I was bored. I'm sure it doesn't help that I can't stand boxing.
It's like every other Rocky movie. You know exactly how it will all play out within the first few minutes. There will be ups, there will be downs, there will be a training montage, and there will be a big fight at the finish.
There were a few good moments that I could appreciate. And the denouement (the end of the film after the dramatic climax) was good and tied everything up satisfactorily. And though it is a bit strange, the character I was most interested and invested in was Viktor Drago.
The film is rated PG-13 for ... well, all the things you'd expect after seeing the first Creed.
Like I said, if you like Rocky movies, by all means, go see Creed II. I'm sure you'll enjoy it.
If you like Rocky movies or liked the first Creed, I'm sure you'll like this one. I don't like those and I didn't like this. But that's me. I acknowledge that it was a good movie and a well-made movie. But I was bored. I'm sure it doesn't help that I can't stand boxing.
It's like every other Rocky movie. You know exactly how it will all play out within the first few minutes. There will be ups, there will be downs, there will be a training montage, and there will be a big fight at the finish.
There were a few good moments that I could appreciate. And the denouement (the end of the film after the dramatic climax) was good and tied everything up satisfactorily. And though it is a bit strange, the character I was most interested and invested in was Viktor Drago.
The film is rated PG-13 for ... well, all the things you'd expect after seeing the first Creed.
Like I said, if you like Rocky movies, by all means, go see Creed II. I'm sure you'll enjoy it.
Quotable Quotes
- "This guy's got nothing to lose. And a guy with nothing to lose is dangerous." "I'm dangerous!" -- Rocky and Adonis
- "We're naming her 'Amara.'" "Amara? Why not go with an easier name, like 'Becky' or 'Cate'?" "Cate Creed? You do know she's going to be black, right?" "Oh, yeah." -- Adonis and Rocky
ISFS
18 December 2018
The Bells of Christmas
Sleigh bells. Silver bells. Jingle bells. If the spirit of Christmas could be captured in a sound, it would be the sound of bells. “Hark how the bells, sweet silver bells, all seem to say ... Christmas is here.” The bells of Christmas tinkle and ring, clamor and clang, chime and peal, signaling the season with their merriment and good cheer.
Whether we’re “dashing through the snow, in a one-horse open sleigh” or “dancin’ and prancin’ in jingle bell square,” the bells of Christmas fill the air. As we “shoppers rush home with [our] treasures,” still can be heard the ring-a-ling of silver bells. And when we’re “caroling, caroling through the snow,” through it all those “Christmas bells are ringing.” No Christmas song – no holiday commercial – would be complete without the ubiquitous jingle jangle of bells.
But what is it we hear as these Christmas bells chime? Does each bell remind us that Clarence – or some other angel – has gotten his wings? Does the clear tone of a bell entreat us to believe in the magic of Christmas for one more year? Do we hear a familiar instrument, played in every song and at every concert? Do we hear our own doorbells, heralding the arrival of our latest package, another guest, or a treat-bearing neighbor? Or do we hear little more than the clang of the Salvation Army worker outside our local grocer, signaling us to avoid eye contact as we scurry inside?
The bells of Christmas are ringing, but do we hear their message?
In a social media post, Elder David A. Bednar explained: “Bells at Christmastime symbolize the announcement of the birth of Christ when angels in heaven praised God and declared, ‘Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace, good will toward men.’”
Millennia later, it can still be sung: “Ding dong merrily on high, in heav’n the bells are ringing.” And on earth, down through the ages, the “belfries of all Christendom” still peal loud and clear: “God is not dead, nor doth he sleep.” He sent His Son to earth, assuring us that “the world [will revolve] from night to day,” for the Prince of Peace has come and will yet come again. This is the message of the bells.
Christmas is always a busy time of year. But as we hear the bells on Christmas Day, and all throughout the season, may we remember for whom they toll. They toll for Christ. May each tinkling, chiming, or pealing bell remind us of Him and the peace He brings, even amid the clatter and clanging of life. May each street corner bell remind us not to empty our wallets, but to fill our hearts with love and generosity toward our fellow man. May each doorbell remind us of the arrival of God’s gift of His Only Begotten Son and remind us that He too should be our welcome Guest. As we let Christ in, “above all this bustle [we’ll] hear” the bells and their message of peace on earth, good will toward men.
“Sleigh bells ring ... are [we] listening?”
Merry Christmas!
Whether we’re “dashing through the snow, in a one-horse open sleigh” or “dancin’ and prancin’ in jingle bell square,” the bells of Christmas fill the air. As we “shoppers rush home with [our] treasures,” still can be heard the ring-a-ling of silver bells. And when we’re “caroling, caroling through the snow,” through it all those “Christmas bells are ringing.” No Christmas song – no holiday commercial – would be complete without the ubiquitous jingle jangle of bells.
But what is it we hear as these Christmas bells chime? Does each bell remind us that Clarence – or some other angel – has gotten his wings? Does the clear tone of a bell entreat us to believe in the magic of Christmas for one more year? Do we hear a familiar instrument, played in every song and at every concert? Do we hear our own doorbells, heralding the arrival of our latest package, another guest, or a treat-bearing neighbor? Or do we hear little more than the clang of the Salvation Army worker outside our local grocer, signaling us to avoid eye contact as we scurry inside?
The bells of Christmas are ringing, but do we hear their message?
In a social media post, Elder David A. Bednar explained: “Bells at Christmastime symbolize the announcement of the birth of Christ when angels in heaven praised God and declared, ‘Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace, good will toward men.’”
Millennia later, it can still be sung: “Ding dong merrily on high, in heav’n the bells are ringing.” And on earth, down through the ages, the “belfries of all Christendom” still peal loud and clear: “God is not dead, nor doth he sleep.” He sent His Son to earth, assuring us that “the world [will revolve] from night to day,” for the Prince of Peace has come and will yet come again. This is the message of the bells.
Christmas is always a busy time of year. But as we hear the bells on Christmas Day, and all throughout the season, may we remember for whom they toll. They toll for Christ. May each tinkling, chiming, or pealing bell remind us of Him and the peace He brings, even amid the clatter and clanging of life. May each street corner bell remind us not to empty our wallets, but to fill our hearts with love and generosity toward our fellow man. May each doorbell remind us of the arrival of God’s gift of His Only Begotten Son and remind us that He too should be our welcome Guest. As we let Christ in, “above all this bustle [we’ll] hear” the bells and their message of peace on earth, good will toward men.
“Sleigh bells ring ... are [we] listening?”
Merry Christmas!
26 November 2018
Ralph Breaks the Internet
Year: 2018
Director: Phil Johnston and Rich Moore
Starring: John C. Reilly, Sarah Silverman, Gal Gadot, Taraji P. Henson, Alan Tudyk, and all of the Disney Princesses
Starring: John C. Reilly, Sarah Silverman, Gal Gadot, Taraji P. Henson, Alan Tudyk, and all of the Disney Princesses
Synopsis: After the Sugar Rush arcade game breaks, Ralph and Vanellope journey to the internet in order to find the part needed to fix it.
Review
I liked Wreck-It Ralph (the first movie). It was fun, clever, and had a good story to tell. I was initially worried they wouldn't be able to pull off a sequel. I was wrong. The sequel is as good as the original. With the whole internet as fodder, Ralph Breaks the Internet is terrific.
Disney animation continues to be top notch. The world that is the internet is incredibly creative and highly detailed. It's mind blowing to think how much work they put into creating a tangible world to represent the insanity that is the world wide web. And it works. I may never look at pop-up ads quite the same way. I'm also fond of the idea that there is a little avatar version of me wandering around the internet, doing my shopping or reading the news or whatever.
The film is also hilarious. There are so many jokes, gags, and Easter eggs that the only way to get everything out of the movie is to watch it multiple times, preferably with a pause button. There's one scene during the climax that had everyone in the audience (myself included) laughing out loud.
All the familiar characters are back from the first movie, including Fix-It Felix and Sgt. Calhoun. Their part is small, but is still funny. We are also treated to many new characters, such as Shank the Slaughter Race driver, Yesss the trending algorithm, KnowsMore the search engine, and J.P. Spamley the pop-up.
The best "new" characters, though, are the Disney Princesses (most voiced by their original voice actress). I was initially worried that all of their scene had already been shown in trailers and other promotional videos. But while most of their first scene was already known, they get a second scene later in the movie. And it was the most epic and hilarious scene in the movie. That's all I'll say here.
As clever and funny as Ralph Breaks the Internet is, it also has a heart. At its core, the story is about the friendship between Ralph and Vanellope. They may be video game characters in a digital world, but their friendship is real, complete with real struggles and growth. It's interesting to see a real friendship within the world of the internet and social media. Perhaps that's why the story works so well and is so timely.
The film is rated PG for some action and some mild rude humor (the same as in the first Wreck-It Ralph).
If you are looking for a hilarious, family-friendly movie, go see Ralph Breaks the Internet. Be sure to stick around for the mid-credits and post-credits scenes.
*** Spoiler Section ***
One of the highlights of the movie is when Vanellope goes to the Oh My Disney fan site, which features all the fandoms under the Disney umbrella. As Vanellope wanders, the cameos come blink-and-you'll-miss-them fast. I recall seeing Baby Groot, Eeyore, C-3PO, Heihei, Grumpy, a Stan Lee avatar, Buzz Lightyear, Baymax, Iron Man, and Nick Wilde (from Zootopia). It's fun and crazy to see all those characters in one place, however briefly.
At one point during that sequence, one of the Storm Troopers falls (or something) and does the Wilhelm Scream. That made me so happy.
Speaking of screaming, clearly screaming goats are a thing. This is the third movie this year to include a screaming goat.
The best scene was definitely when all the Disney Princesses team up to save Ralph. I need to watch that scene again just to get everything that happens so quickly. Seeing each princess do her part to help by using her unique talents is terrific in and of itself. But when you throw in clips of each of their signature songs ... yeah, that's just epic Disney awesomeness.
Disney animation continues to be top notch. The world that is the internet is incredibly creative and highly detailed. It's mind blowing to think how much work they put into creating a tangible world to represent the insanity that is the world wide web. And it works. I may never look at pop-up ads quite the same way. I'm also fond of the idea that there is a little avatar version of me wandering around the internet, doing my shopping or reading the news or whatever.
The film is also hilarious. There are so many jokes, gags, and Easter eggs that the only way to get everything out of the movie is to watch it multiple times, preferably with a pause button. There's one scene during the climax that had everyone in the audience (myself included) laughing out loud.
All the familiar characters are back from the first movie, including Fix-It Felix and Sgt. Calhoun. Their part is small, but is still funny. We are also treated to many new characters, such as Shank the Slaughter Race driver, Yesss the trending algorithm, KnowsMore the search engine, and J.P. Spamley the pop-up.
The best "new" characters, though, are the Disney Princesses (most voiced by their original voice actress). I was initially worried that all of their scene had already been shown in trailers and other promotional videos. But while most of their first scene was already known, they get a second scene later in the movie. And it was the most epic and hilarious scene in the movie. That's all I'll say here.
As clever and funny as Ralph Breaks the Internet is, it also has a heart. At its core, the story is about the friendship between Ralph and Vanellope. They may be video game characters in a digital world, but their friendship is real, complete with real struggles and growth. It's interesting to see a real friendship within the world of the internet and social media. Perhaps that's why the story works so well and is so timely.
The film is rated PG for some action and some mild rude humor (the same as in the first Wreck-It Ralph).
If you are looking for a hilarious, family-friendly movie, go see Ralph Breaks the Internet. Be sure to stick around for the mid-credits and post-credits scenes.
*** Spoiler Section ***
One of the highlights of the movie is when Vanellope goes to the Oh My Disney fan site, which features all the fandoms under the Disney umbrella. As Vanellope wanders, the cameos come blink-and-you'll-miss-them fast. I recall seeing Baby Groot, Eeyore, C-3PO, Heihei, Grumpy, a Stan Lee avatar, Buzz Lightyear, Baymax, Iron Man, and Nick Wilde (from Zootopia). It's fun and crazy to see all those characters in one place, however briefly.
At one point during that sequence, one of the Storm Troopers falls (or something) and does the Wilhelm Scream. That made me so happy.
Speaking of screaming, clearly screaming goats are a thing. This is the third movie this year to include a screaming goat.
Quotable Quotes
- "My Autofill is a touch aggressive today." -- KnowsMore
- "Are you guys OK? Should I call the police?" -- Vanellope to the Disney Princesses
- "I don't even have a mom." "Neither do we!" -- Vanellope and most of the Disney Princesses
- "There's no law saying best friends have to have the same dreams." -- Shank
- "Did you like the movie, honey?" "Yeah. But there was a scene in the trailer that wasn't in the movie." -- Mom and Girl
ISFS
23 November 2018
Green Book
Year: 2018
Director: Peter Farrelly
Starring: Viggo Mortensen, Mahershala Ali, and Linda Cardellini
Starring: Viggo Mortensen, Mahershala Ali, and Linda Cardellini
Tagline: Based on a true friendship
Synopsis: An Italian-American bouncer becomes the driver for a black classical pianist who is going on tour in the 1960s deep south.
Synopsis: An Italian-American bouncer becomes the driver for a black classical pianist who is going on tour in the 1960s deep south.
Review
Unless you are a film aficionado, you may not have heard of Green Book, which is too bad. You'll probably hear more about it once awards season rolls around, because it is an excellent film worthy of recognition.
The title comes from The Negro Motorist Green Book, which included hotels and restaurants where blacks were allowed in the Jim Crow South.
The tagline for the film explains that this is a true story. It is the story of how Tony "Lip" Vallelonga and Don Shirley forged a lifelong friendship. It is quite the story, since you could hardly imagine two more different men from two more different backgrounds. Yet as they spend time together, talk to each other, and listen to each other, they develop a mutual respect and friendship. There is tremendous hope in such a story.
As the filmmakers have pointed out, the film isn't necessarily meant to be about race relations in the 1960s. It's about the experiences of these two men. It's about how (admittedly racist) Tony changes because of this road trip with Don, as he gets to know him and as he sees how he is treated. Time after time, Don is welcomed as an esteemed guest, only to be told he cannot use the restroom, eat in the restaurant, or even be out after dark.
According to the articles I've read, the story is highly accurate, aside from some tweaks to the timeline. Tony's son, Nick Vallelonga, was one of the screenwriters and producers. Over the years, he recorded his father's and Dr. Shirley's stories so he could eventually tell them. Don Shirley told Nick to tell the truth -- all of it. His only stipulation was to wait until he had passed away. (He and Tony died within months of each other in 2013.)
Although the film is a drama and addresses some weighty themes, it also has touches of humor. Tony and Don have an excellent banter throughout. And both Viggo Mortensen and Mahershala Ali are fantastic in their roles. (I barley recognized Aragorn.)
The film is rated PG-13 for mature themes and some violence and also for Tony's incessantly bad language. He primarily likes the S word but he also says the F word at one point.
If you are looking for a well-told drama, I highly recommend Green Book. It's an inspiring story of friendship that is especially timely in our increasingly divisive world.
*** Spoiler Section ***
When Tony and Don get pulled over for the second time by a police officer, my thought was, "Not again. They did nothing!" So when the officer informs them they have a flat tire, it was a wonderful, hopeful moment that reminds us that there are still plenty of good people in the world, then and now. The officer directs traffic around them and even holds a light for Tony as he fixes the tire.
I also loved that, at the end, it is Don driving while Tony -- exhausted -- is asleep in the back. It says so much about the friendship they've developed.
The title comes from The Negro Motorist Green Book, which included hotels and restaurants where blacks were allowed in the Jim Crow South.
The tagline for the film explains that this is a true story. It is the story of how Tony "Lip" Vallelonga and Don Shirley forged a lifelong friendship. It is quite the story, since you could hardly imagine two more different men from two more different backgrounds. Yet as they spend time together, talk to each other, and listen to each other, they develop a mutual respect and friendship. There is tremendous hope in such a story.
As the filmmakers have pointed out, the film isn't necessarily meant to be about race relations in the 1960s. It's about the experiences of these two men. It's about how (admittedly racist) Tony changes because of this road trip with Don, as he gets to know him and as he sees how he is treated. Time after time, Don is welcomed as an esteemed guest, only to be told he cannot use the restroom, eat in the restaurant, or even be out after dark.
According to the articles I've read, the story is highly accurate, aside from some tweaks to the timeline. Tony's son, Nick Vallelonga, was one of the screenwriters and producers. Over the years, he recorded his father's and Dr. Shirley's stories so he could eventually tell them. Don Shirley told Nick to tell the truth -- all of it. His only stipulation was to wait until he had passed away. (He and Tony died within months of each other in 2013.)
Although the film is a drama and addresses some weighty themes, it also has touches of humor. Tony and Don have an excellent banter throughout. And both Viggo Mortensen and Mahershala Ali are fantastic in their roles. (I barley recognized Aragorn.)
The film is rated PG-13 for mature themes and some violence and also for Tony's incessantly bad language. He primarily likes the S word but he also says the F word at one point.
If you are looking for a well-told drama, I highly recommend Green Book. It's an inspiring story of friendship that is especially timely in our increasingly divisive world.
*** Spoiler Section ***
When Tony and Don get pulled over for the second time by a police officer, my thought was, "Not again. They did nothing!" So when the officer informs them they have a flat tire, it was a wonderful, hopeful moment that reminds us that there are still plenty of good people in the world, then and now. The officer directs traffic around them and even holds a light for Tony as he fixes the tire.
I also loved that, at the end, it is Don driving while Tony -- exhausted -- is asleep in the back. It says so much about the friendship they've developed.
Quotable Quotes
- "Pick it up, Tony." "Squirrels woulda eaten it anyway." "Pick it up." -- Tony and Don regarding litter
- "He's a doctor of piano or something." "You can do that?" -- Tony and Dolores
- "That's like clinging a cow bell at the end of Shostakovich's 7th." "That's good?" -- Don and Tony
- "If I'm not black enough and if I'm not white enough and if I'm not man enough! Then tell me, Tony, what am I?!" -- Don
ISFS
20 November 2018
Fantasic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald
Year: 2018
Director: David Yates
Starring: Eddie Redmayne, Dan Fogler, Katherine Waterston, Alison Sudol, Johnny Depp, Jude Law, Zoe Kravitz, Ezra Miller, and Claudia Kim
Starring: Eddie Redmayne, Dan Fogler, Katherine Waterston, Alison Sudol, Johnny Depp, Jude Law, Zoe Kravitz, Ezra Miller, and Claudia Kim
Tagline: Who Will Change the Future?
Synopsis: When the dark wizard Grindelwald escapes from custody, Albus Dumbledore enlists Newt Scamander to help track him down.
Synopsis: When the dark wizard Grindelwald escapes from custody, Albus Dumbledore enlists Newt Scamander to help track him down.
Review
Seventeen years ago, Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone was released in theaters. I'd never read any of the books. But once I'd seen the movie, I was an immediate fan. I have been ever since. As such, I absolutely loved Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald. It was so much of what I love about the Wizarding World of J.K. Rowling.
That makes this one of the rare movies where I completely disagree with the critics. I haven't read what they had to say, but I saw the score on Rotten Tomatoes and it made me sad. Having seen the movie, I think I do understand their qualms. Crimes of Grindelwald is very much a film for the fans. It doesn't work as a standalone film. Not at all. If you didn't see the first Fantastic Beasts you'd be utterly lost. If you didn't have a basic understanding of the world of Harry Potter, you wouldn't be as excited, as stunned, or as knowing. Lacking that foundation, so much of the film would fly over your head like a snitch in a Quidditch game.
It might also be argued that the story isn't as tight as it could be. There are numerous threads running through the film. Some came from the previous film and others are new. Almost none of them find any resolution by the time the credits roll. In fact, we are left with far more questions than answers. This is part of a 5-part story arc after all.
I've also heard some complaints that this one is less fun and darker than the first one. The tone is certainly different here. And the themes are indeed much darker. Far more is at stake. In the first, it seemed to be a few lives at stake (and sometimes more than a few). But now it is the world that is at stake and war is being waged not simply for lives, but for minds and souls, which can prove far more heart-wrenching to the invested viewer.
Grindelwald is a clever fellow. Persuasive too, as can be seen by the number of followers he gathers and even by who he is able to gather. Most dangerously, he seems to be a patient villain, willing to bide his time and wait for the right moments for things rather than always trying to force his will. It makes him interesting and all the more dangerous. And he is a fitting villain for the time frame of the movie. We are in the late 1920s. Grindewald's speeches and tactics echo the rise of the Third Reich and Hitler.
While the film is certainly darker -- and perhaps not suitable for the youngest kiddos who might be frightened -- the film is not devoid of fun. I laughed numerous times throughout the film. Newt is still odd but in an endearing way. Jacob is his lovable self, though he admittedly has less to do this time around. There aren't as many beasts this time, but they are fascinating nonetheless. And I personally quite like Jude Law's take on a young Albus Dumbledore.
The film is full of little moments for the fans. There are items and names and locations that make us giddy with recognition. I thought the story was well told for what it is. And I really liked the characters, both old and new. There's so much going on and it is all exciting.
In sum, if you are a Harry Potter fan, you will likely love Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald. And you'll likely be as puzzled as everyone else by certain things and thus on the edge of your seat until the next film comes out (November 2020). J.K. Rowling certainly knows how to spin a great story.
That makes this one of the rare movies where I completely disagree with the critics. I haven't read what they had to say, but I saw the score on Rotten Tomatoes and it made me sad. Having seen the movie, I think I do understand their qualms. Crimes of Grindelwald is very much a film for the fans. It doesn't work as a standalone film. Not at all. If you didn't see the first Fantastic Beasts you'd be utterly lost. If you didn't have a basic understanding of the world of Harry Potter, you wouldn't be as excited, as stunned, or as knowing. Lacking that foundation, so much of the film would fly over your head like a snitch in a Quidditch game.
It might also be argued that the story isn't as tight as it could be. There are numerous threads running through the film. Some came from the previous film and others are new. Almost none of them find any resolution by the time the credits roll. In fact, we are left with far more questions than answers. This is part of a 5-part story arc after all.
I've also heard some complaints that this one is less fun and darker than the first one. The tone is certainly different here. And the themes are indeed much darker. Far more is at stake. In the first, it seemed to be a few lives at stake (and sometimes more than a few). But now it is the world that is at stake and war is being waged not simply for lives, but for minds and souls, which can prove far more heart-wrenching to the invested viewer.
Grindelwald is a clever fellow. Persuasive too, as can be seen by the number of followers he gathers and even by who he is able to gather. Most dangerously, he seems to be a patient villain, willing to bide his time and wait for the right moments for things rather than always trying to force his will. It makes him interesting and all the more dangerous. And he is a fitting villain for the time frame of the movie. We are in the late 1920s. Grindewald's speeches and tactics echo the rise of the Third Reich and Hitler.
While the film is certainly darker -- and perhaps not suitable for the youngest kiddos who might be frightened -- the film is not devoid of fun. I laughed numerous times throughout the film. Newt is still odd but in an endearing way. Jacob is his lovable self, though he admittedly has less to do this time around. There aren't as many beasts this time, but they are fascinating nonetheless. And I personally quite like Jude Law's take on a young Albus Dumbledore.
The film is full of little moments for the fans. There are items and names and locations that make us giddy with recognition. I thought the story was well told for what it is. And I really liked the characters, both old and new. There's so much going on and it is all exciting.
In sum, if you are a Harry Potter fan, you will likely love Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald. And you'll likely be as puzzled as everyone else by certain things and thus on the edge of your seat until the next film comes out (November 2020). J.K. Rowling certainly knows how to spin a great story.
Quotable Quotes
- "Do you get motion sickness?" "I don't do well on boats." "You'll be fine." -- Newt and Jacob
- "Don't say 'salamandar.'" -- Jacob to Newt
- "Accio Niffler!" -- Newt
- "Follow the feather." -- Newt
- "You never met a monster you couldn't love." -- Leta to Newt
*** Spoiler Section ***
Have you seen the film yet? Because if you haven't, you shouldn't be down here. Seriously, stop reading and go see the movie first.
OK, where to start.
I really wanted to take a closer look at that Lestrange family tree. I'm still confused as to how Leta is related to Bellatrix (or rather to her husband). I really liked Leta's character by the way. I thought she was a good character for the film and had a fitting story arc.
Speaking of the Lestranges. So is that Senegalese Yusuf fellow actually free of his Unbreakable Vow? The person he was supposed to kill is long since dead. Now what happens? Since he lived, I guess we'll have to wait and see.
I'm still not sure I'm ready to believe that Nagini the maledictus in this movie is the same Nagini the snake that is the loyal and murderous pet of Lord Voldemort. This Nagini seems decent and good. Even when she had the opportunity to kill the cruel circus master who kept her in a cage, she didn't. And she chose not to believe Grindelwald's lies and follow him. Granted, she has three more movies to go.
And then there's Queenie. I wasn't too surprised by her choice at the end. When we first see her she is already feeling desperate and using unethical means to try and get what she wants. But there's nothing malicious about her. I can't believe she would follow Grindelwald once she saw the truth. And where she is a legilimens, that's going to be interesting. I think Grindelwald either has her under the Imperio curse or has cast some other sort of spell on her. That or he is highly skilled in occlumency to keep her from knowing what he's really thinking.
I almost think the film should have been named the Lies of Grindelwald. He is an expert at them. And I fully believe his reveal to Credence at the end is simply another one. How would Grindelwald even know who Credence really is? Undoubtedly Dumbledore told Grindelwald in their chummy days the story/legend that Grindelwald then tells Credence. And what better way to get Credence to do what he wants. Whether as Graves or as Grindelwald, he has done nothing but lie to Credence and has never fully understood who Credence is.
From a logistic standpoint. The timeline simply doesn't work. If Credence is 19 (he was said to be 18 in the first movie), then he is far to young to be the son of Albus' parents. Albus' mother would have been dead and his father would have been in Azkaban. And with all the dirt Rita Skeeter later dug up on Albus, how would she have possibly missed this? Also, when Dumbledore is being fully open with Harry, why would he confess about Ariana and skip over another sibling? It doesn't add up.
I think it is a clever lie by Grindelwald and a clever hook/misdirect by J.K. Rowling. We'll have to wait and see.
ISFS
13 November 2018
The Grinch
Year: 2018
Director: Yarrow Cheney and Scott Mosier
Starring: Benedict Cumberbatch, Cameron Seely, Rashida Jones, Pharrell Williams, Kenan Thompson, and Angela Lansbury
Starring: Benedict Cumberbatch, Cameron Seely, Rashida Jones, Pharrell Williams, Kenan Thompson, and Angela Lansbury
Tagline: It's never too early to be annoyed by Christmas
Synopsis: Unlike the neighboring Whos down in Whoville, the Grinch cannot stand Christmas. So, with his loyal dog, Max, he plots to keep Christmas from coming.
Synopsis: Unlike the neighboring Whos down in Whoville, the Grinch cannot stand Christmas. So, with his loyal dog, Max, he plots to keep Christmas from coming.
Review
I grew up with the Chuck Jones How the Grinch Stole Christmas animated film. For various reasons, I never saw the Jim Carrey version. Going in to The Grinch, I wasn't entirely sure what to expect. Coming out of the film, I was pleased with having seen it, but at the same time, I was a little disappointed about some things.
Let's start with some of the film's struggles.
The 1966 version of the story is 26 minutes. The Grinch is 86 minutes. That means an hour's worth of backstory, side story, and padding. Yes, Fred the reindeer is cute and has a sweet little story line. But he really isn't needed. Sure, Cindy Lou Who is kind and has an endearing little story line. But that isn't really needed either. The power of the original film (and the book, for that matter) is in its succinctness. While the padding is nice, and colorful, and at times fun ... ultimately it is still padding that detracts and waters down the core of the story.
Speaking of watered down, this Grinch is quite watered down from the original. He's far more misunderstood and lonely than mean. This Grinch doesn't seem to have "garlic in his soul." On the one hand, that makes him more likable and relatable. We don't mind spending an extra hour with him. But it also diminishes the power of his final transformation.
When I heard that Benedict Cumberbatch had been cast as the Grinch, I was excited. I was expecting something along the lines of Smaug from The Hobbit. Sadly, that is not what we got. It seemed Benedict didn't even want to compete with Boris Karloff's Grinch.
Also a let down was the narrator. I have nothing against Pharrell Williams, but he does not have a suitably epic narrator voice. Again, did they decide to not even try to compete with Boris Karloff?
Lastly, if you must do a new version of "You're a Mean One, Mr. Grinch," do it justice and do the whole song in a manner the story and song deserve.
The world created in the film is gorgeous and fun. It has an appropriately Seussical look and feel with lots of bright colors and curvy shapes.
It's nice to see that the Grinch and Max have a better relationship. It's obvious that despite his faults, the Grinch truly cares for his loyal dog.
I'll admit, I was excited when I recognized Angela Lansbury's voice as the Mayor of Whoville.
The highlight of the film is the Grinch's heist scene. He uses an array of clever gadgets and gizmos to help him clear out the entire town in one night. That part is terrific.
I also have to give The Grinch major props for including real Christmas songs. Yes, it has "The Twelve Days of Christmas" and "The Christmas Song." But I was pleased that "God Rest Ye Merry Gentlemen" and "Silent Night" both featured prominently. Thank you. And if you were worried, "Welcome Christmas" (aka the "Da Who Doray" song) is also present.
The film is rated PG for an incident where one of the young Whos loses his clothes in a mishap and has to cover himself with a very large cookie. I don't recall anything else.
While I do think the Grinch's redemptive transformation is watered down in this version, The Grinch still has a good message about kindness and reaching out to others. And those are certainly things we need more of in this world.
If you need a family film to get you in the Christmas spirit, The Grinch is a colorful, clever, and enjoyable option. I don't think it will ever be a holiday staple*, but it's certainly worth seeing. Now if you'll excuse me, I need to go hunt down the 1966 animated version and listen to the Thurl Ravencroft version of the song.
* My Christmas staples are Muppet Christmas Carol and Prep and Landing ... in case you were wondering.
*** Spoiler Section ***
Seriously, what is up with screaming goats? First there was one in Small Foot, now there is one in The Grinch. Are screaming goats a thing and I just haven't heard about them until now? I'm so confused.
As cute as Fred the reindeer is, and as sweet as it is that he comes back to help at the end, I didn't like that part. Yeah, they needed Fred to serve some purpose in the story and show kindness to the Grinch. But in that climactic moment, Fred's help undermines the power of that scene in the original. We lose this important part: "And then the true meaning of Christmas came through, and the Grinch found the strength of ten Grinches, plus two!" It is the Grinch who rescues the falling sleigh with newfound strength from his newfound understanding. Fred is sweet, but in this version, that triumphant/transformative moment is lost.
Let's start with some of the film's struggles.
The 1966 version of the story is 26 minutes. The Grinch is 86 minutes. That means an hour's worth of backstory, side story, and padding. Yes, Fred the reindeer is cute and has a sweet little story line. But he really isn't needed. Sure, Cindy Lou Who is kind and has an endearing little story line. But that isn't really needed either. The power of the original film (and the book, for that matter) is in its succinctness. While the padding is nice, and colorful, and at times fun ... ultimately it is still padding that detracts and waters down the core of the story.
Speaking of watered down, this Grinch is quite watered down from the original. He's far more misunderstood and lonely than mean. This Grinch doesn't seem to have "garlic in his soul." On the one hand, that makes him more likable and relatable. We don't mind spending an extra hour with him. But it also diminishes the power of his final transformation.
When I heard that Benedict Cumberbatch had been cast as the Grinch, I was excited. I was expecting something along the lines of Smaug from The Hobbit. Sadly, that is not what we got. It seemed Benedict didn't even want to compete with Boris Karloff's Grinch.
Also a let down was the narrator. I have nothing against Pharrell Williams, but he does not have a suitably epic narrator voice. Again, did they decide to not even try to compete with Boris Karloff?
Lastly, if you must do a new version of "You're a Mean One, Mr. Grinch," do it justice and do the whole song in a manner the story and song deserve.
Now for what the film did right.
The world created in the film is gorgeous and fun. It has an appropriately Seussical look and feel with lots of bright colors and curvy shapes.
It's nice to see that the Grinch and Max have a better relationship. It's obvious that despite his faults, the Grinch truly cares for his loyal dog.
I'll admit, I was excited when I recognized Angela Lansbury's voice as the Mayor of Whoville.
The highlight of the film is the Grinch's heist scene. He uses an array of clever gadgets and gizmos to help him clear out the entire town in one night. That part is terrific.
I also have to give The Grinch major props for including real Christmas songs. Yes, it has "The Twelve Days of Christmas" and "The Christmas Song." But I was pleased that "God Rest Ye Merry Gentlemen" and "Silent Night" both featured prominently. Thank you. And if you were worried, "Welcome Christmas" (aka the "Da Who Doray" song) is also present.
The film is rated PG for an incident where one of the young Whos loses his clothes in a mishap and has to cover himself with a very large cookie. I don't recall anything else.
While I do think the Grinch's redemptive transformation is watered down in this version, The Grinch still has a good message about kindness and reaching out to others. And those are certainly things we need more of in this world.
If you need a family film to get you in the Christmas spirit, The Grinch is a colorful, clever, and enjoyable option. I don't think it will ever be a holiday staple*, but it's certainly worth seeing. Now if you'll excuse me, I need to go hunt down the 1966 animated version and listen to the Thurl Ravencroft version of the song.
* My Christmas staples are Muppet Christmas Carol and Prep and Landing ... in case you were wondering.
*** Spoiler Section ***
Seriously, what is up with screaming goats? First there was one in Small Foot, now there is one in The Grinch. Are screaming goats a thing and I just haven't heard about them until now? I'm so confused.
As cute as Fred the reindeer is, and as sweet as it is that he comes back to help at the end, I didn't like that part. Yeah, they needed Fred to serve some purpose in the story and show kindness to the Grinch. But in that climactic moment, Fred's help undermines the power of that scene in the original. We lose this important part: "And then the true meaning of Christmas came through, and the Grinch found the strength of ten Grinches, plus two!" It is the Grinch who rescues the falling sleigh with newfound strength from his newfound understanding. Fred is sweet, but in this version, that triumphant/transformative moment is lost.
Quotable Quotes
- "This is the loudest snow I've ever heard in my life." -- The Grinch
- "Today we will do mean things, and we will do them with style." -- The Grinch
- "If I'm gonna be Santa, then I need to get into character." [Reads that Santa is always jolly.] "Well, that's never going to happen." -- The Grinch
- "I put on a tie." -- The Grinch
ISFS
18 October 2018
First Man
Year: 2018
Director: Damien Chazelle
Starring: Ryan Gosling, Claire Foy, Jason Clarke, Kyle Chandler, Corey Stoll, and Ciaran Hinds
Starring: Ryan Gosling, Claire Foy, Jason Clarke, Kyle Chandler, Corey Stoll, and Ciaran Hinds
Tagline: One giant leap into the unknown
Synopsis: A look at the life of Neil Armstrong as he goes from test pilot to the first man on the Moon.
Synopsis: A look at the life of Neil Armstrong as he goes from test pilot to the first man on the Moon.
Review
From my elementary school days, I knew the name Neil Armstrong. And I knew he was the first man to walk on the Moon. I also knew he safely returned from the Moon. So when I say that First Man kept me on the edge of my seat wondering what was going to happen next, it's a pretty high compliment to the filmmakers.
Watching this film is probably as close to being an astronaut as I'll ever get. And I'm OK with that. The filmmakers opted for many tight shots and perspective shots. At times, you feel you are seeing what Neil and the other astronauts would have seen -- and only what they would have seen. We first see the Moon, for example, only through a small window. The visuals are amazing, but they can also feel claustrophobic and dizzying at times. Being an astronaut involves a lot of spinning, it would seem. If you get motion sick easily, be warned.
The visual highlights of the film are, rightly, the Apollo 11 launch and the Eagle landing on the Moon. The filmmakers clearly pulled out all the stops to make those scenes as visual and visceral as possible. As close as they could, they make it feel like you are there. I'll never know what it was like to watch the actual Apollo mission on live television. This will have to do. And it delivers.
As the story unfolded, I realized how little I actually knew/remembered about the Gemini and Apollo space programs. I only remember a little from my history classes. I vaguely recalled that there were serious setbacks and that astronauts lost their lives. But it wasn't as real to me. First Man does a beautiful job putting some of those things in perspective. While Neil is the focus of the film, we see him interact with friends in the program. And, with him, we feel loss when tragedies happen. The cost of the space program has never been more real to me.
There's a powerful scene just before the Apollo 11 launch that has the head of the manned space program reading through a prepared contingency statement ... just in case Neil and Buzz don't make it back from the Moon. I've always taken it for granted that they went to the Moon and came back. It's sobering to realize it wasn't that certain.
Although there is much about NASA, the other astronauts, and the space race to the Moon in First Man, ultimately, those take a backseat to the personal story of Neil Armstrong. This is less a story about how we got to the Moon, and more a story about Neil's physical and emotional journey during those years. As one critic I read noted, Neil and his wife Janet are the only well-rounded characters in the film. The others are intentionally rather flat, because this is Neil's and Janet's story. Ryan Gosling and Claire Foy do an amazing job telling that story.
First Man isn't a romanticized view of Neil Armstrong the hero. Rather it's an intimate view of Neil Armstrong the human, the father, the husband, the friend, and also the astronaut. It could be argued that the film is as much about coping with the loss of a child as it is about landing on the Moon. And I believe the story is better for that.
I also quite enjoyed the film's soundtrack. There were some fitting 60s songs thrown in. But it was mostly the score I enjoyed. The filmmakers use less-common instruments, like a theremin, to give the music a unique sound. And the music for the Apollo launch and Moon landing are sufficiently epic.
First Man is rated PG-13. There is no violence or sexuality in the film. But there are off screen deaths, heavy themes, and one F-bomb (shouted by a character at their absolute breaking point). I don't recall much (if any) other language.
I quite enjoyed First Man. It's a thoughtful look at the personal life of a man most of us only know from history books and video clips. It was also a very real look on what the Gemini and Apollo astronauts went through. If you are interested in space or in biopics, I recommend First Man. But if you are prone to motion sickness, maybe wait to see it on a smaller screen.
*** Spoiler Section ***
When asked at the final pre-flight press conference, Neil declines to answer what personal item(s) he'll be taking to the moon. I was pretty sure I knew what the movie would portray. And I was not disappointed. It was a fitting emotional climax to the movie. Neil made it to the moon, and he came to terms with his daughter's death.
Apparently the film raised some controversy because it doesn't depict the iconic moment when Neil and Buzz plant the American flag on the Moon's surface. The flag is shown in subsequent shots, but the moment isn't a focal point. Some felt that made the film somehow "un-American." I disagree. But more to the point, the film isn't about NASA or the U.S. landing on the Moon. It's about Neil. It's about his journey, physically and emotionally. His moment with Karen's bracelet is the emotional climax the film needed. Making a big to do about planting the flag would have detracted from that moment. First Man is about an American triumph, but not about American exceptionalism.
Lastly, I loved the final scene of the movie: where Neil is in quarantine and Janet comes to visit. I kept wondering what on earth they could possibly say to each other in that moment. What could they say that wouldn't be cheesy or corny or saccharine-filled? The filmmakers must have wondered that too, and came up with the perfect moment. Neil and Janet say nothing. At least nothing with words. It works so well.
Watching this film is probably as close to being an astronaut as I'll ever get. And I'm OK with that. The filmmakers opted for many tight shots and perspective shots. At times, you feel you are seeing what Neil and the other astronauts would have seen -- and only what they would have seen. We first see the Moon, for example, only through a small window. The visuals are amazing, but they can also feel claustrophobic and dizzying at times. Being an astronaut involves a lot of spinning, it would seem. If you get motion sick easily, be warned.
The visual highlights of the film are, rightly, the Apollo 11 launch and the Eagle landing on the Moon. The filmmakers clearly pulled out all the stops to make those scenes as visual and visceral as possible. As close as they could, they make it feel like you are there. I'll never know what it was like to watch the actual Apollo mission on live television. This will have to do. And it delivers.
As the story unfolded, I realized how little I actually knew/remembered about the Gemini and Apollo space programs. I only remember a little from my history classes. I vaguely recalled that there were serious setbacks and that astronauts lost their lives. But it wasn't as real to me. First Man does a beautiful job putting some of those things in perspective. While Neil is the focus of the film, we see him interact with friends in the program. And, with him, we feel loss when tragedies happen. The cost of the space program has never been more real to me.
There's a powerful scene just before the Apollo 11 launch that has the head of the manned space program reading through a prepared contingency statement ... just in case Neil and Buzz don't make it back from the Moon. I've always taken it for granted that they went to the Moon and came back. It's sobering to realize it wasn't that certain.
Although there is much about NASA, the other astronauts, and the space race to the Moon in First Man, ultimately, those take a backseat to the personal story of Neil Armstrong. This is less a story about how we got to the Moon, and more a story about Neil's physical and emotional journey during those years. As one critic I read noted, Neil and his wife Janet are the only well-rounded characters in the film. The others are intentionally rather flat, because this is Neil's and Janet's story. Ryan Gosling and Claire Foy do an amazing job telling that story.
First Man isn't a romanticized view of Neil Armstrong the hero. Rather it's an intimate view of Neil Armstrong the human, the father, the husband, the friend, and also the astronaut. It could be argued that the film is as much about coping with the loss of a child as it is about landing on the Moon. And I believe the story is better for that.
I also quite enjoyed the film's soundtrack. There were some fitting 60s songs thrown in. But it was mostly the score I enjoyed. The filmmakers use less-common instruments, like a theremin, to give the music a unique sound. And the music for the Apollo launch and Moon landing are sufficiently epic.
First Man is rated PG-13. There is no violence or sexuality in the film. But there are off screen deaths, heavy themes, and one F-bomb (shouted by a character at their absolute breaking point). I don't recall much (if any) other language.
I quite enjoyed First Man. It's a thoughtful look at the personal life of a man most of us only know from history books and video clips. It was also a very real look on what the Gemini and Apollo astronauts went through. If you are interested in space or in biopics, I recommend First Man. But if you are prone to motion sickness, maybe wait to see it on a smaller screen.
*** Spoiler Section ***
When asked at the final pre-flight press conference, Neil declines to answer what personal item(s) he'll be taking to the moon. I was pretty sure I knew what the movie would portray. And I was not disappointed. It was a fitting emotional climax to the movie. Neil made it to the moon, and he came to terms with his daughter's death.
Apparently the film raised some controversy because it doesn't depict the iconic moment when Neil and Buzz plant the American flag on the Moon's surface. The flag is shown in subsequent shots, but the moment isn't a focal point. Some felt that made the film somehow "un-American." I disagree. But more to the point, the film isn't about NASA or the U.S. landing on the Moon. It's about Neil. It's about his journey, physically and emotionally. His moment with Karen's bracelet is the emotional climax the film needed. Making a big to do about planting the flag would have detracted from that moment. First Man is about an American triumph, but not about American exceptionalism.
Lastly, I loved the final scene of the movie: where Neil is in quarantine and Janet comes to visit. I kept wondering what on earth they could possibly say to each other in that moment. What could they say that wouldn't be cheesy or corny or saccharine-filled? The filmmakers must have wondered that too, and came up with the perfect moment. Neil and Janet say nothing. At least nothing with words. It works so well.
Quotable Quotes
- [Draws the Earth and the Moon on two blackboards] "That's to scale." [Having done the math, a young scientist comes in and moves the moon over a few inches.] "It was almost to scale." -- Deke Slayton
- "Your father's going to the moon." "Oh. Can I go outside and play?" -- Janet and Mark Armstrong
- "Houston, this is Tranquility Base. The Eagle has landed." -- Neil Armstrong
- "That's one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind." -- Neil Armstrong
ISFS
01 October 2018
Smallfoot
Year: 2018
Director: Karey Kirkpatrick and Jason Reisig
Starring: Channing Tatum, Zendaya, James Corden, Common, LeBron James, and Danny DeVito
Starring: Channing Tatum, Zendaya, James Corden, Common, LeBron James, and Danny DeVito
Tagline: Not every legend is a tall tale.
Synopsis: After he is banished from the yeti village, Migo sets out to prove that the mythical "smallfoot" (i.e., humans) exist.
Synopsis: After he is banished from the yeti village, Migo sets out to prove that the mythical "smallfoot" (i.e., humans) exist.
Review
It's not often that I have such mixed feelings about a movie. But they are certainly mixed for Smallfoot. Let's start with the good stuff.
Going into the movie, I had no idea it was a musical. That was not part of the trailers I'd seen. And yet suddenly Channing Tatum's yeti, Migo, starts singing about a perfect day. Surprisingly, Channing Tatum has a pretty good voice. There aren't a lot of songs on the soundtrack, but they were all better than I would have expected from a film that didn't label itself a musical. The best of the bunch (which should definitely receive an Oscar nod) is "Wonderful Life," sung by Zendaya's yeti, Meechee. For me, that sequence was the highlight of the film.
The story is clever and overall well told. It is fairly predictable, but has its fun moments. Reversing the "bigfoot" myth is fun. And the film certainly tries to have some big ideas and depth to it.
Smallfoot is also pretty funny. There were some excellent moments that had a Looney Tunes type feel (think poor Wile E. Coyote). And I quite enjoyed the "gibberish" that the yetis perceived the humans as speaking (whereas the humans perceive only growls from the yetis). There were quite a few times where I chuckled during the movie. And there were moments when kids in the theater were laughing out loud.
While there's nothing outstanding about the animation, it is bright and colorful and certainly never detracts from the story.
As for the characters, they are all likable enough (well, except Fleem, who is supposed to be annoying ... I think). But they are also rather bland. None of the characters were particularly memorable. They were just stock characters who happened to be yetis. The character I liked best was actually Percy, the human. He had enough substance to him and even got a decent little character arc.
So, why the mixed feelings? That has to do with the film's theme and message, which is a double-edged sword. On the one side, the story is about being curious, asking questions, and seeking truth. All of which are good. On the other side, however, the film has a decidedly anti-religious bias to it. The start of the film makes that especially clear as it talks about "laws written on stones" and "creation stories." The film seems to equate religion with blind faith and obedience, which is what the yetis live with at the start.
But religion and questions are not diametrically opposed, as the film strongly suggests. Seeking truth and having faith can go hand in hand. Indeed, my own religion was founded because a young man (Joseph Smith) had questions and sought for the truth. And the truth he found changed the way millions the world over see the world and the purpose of life. And the Book of Mormon -- which he translated -- doesn't tell people to blindly follow arbitrary rules. It specifically directs readers to ask and know for themselves. True religion is not about protecting people from the truth or the harsh realities of life. And while commandments and religious rules/laws are there for our protection, it is not in the way the film portrays.
That said, I'm not saying the film is bad. I don't know how overt that anti-religion message was meant to be. I think it detracts from the story, but doesn't ruin it. Rather, it invites discussion. I'm not a parent, but it seems like this is a film that it is fine for children to see, so long as it is with their parents who then are willing to have a discussion about the subject matter. And I figure that's a good thing, because kids are going to be exposed to these ideas anyway. That's just the secular world we live in.
If you need a family film to see before the holiday season kicks in, you could do far worse than Smallfoot. It's colorful, has good music, and mostly has a good message. It can certainly lead to some family discussions.
*** Spoiler Section ***
How come the yeti don't seem to have noses? And how does their machine produce that much of a cloud cover? Also, what's up with the screaming goat?
Going into the movie, I had no idea it was a musical. That was not part of the trailers I'd seen. And yet suddenly Channing Tatum's yeti, Migo, starts singing about a perfect day. Surprisingly, Channing Tatum has a pretty good voice. There aren't a lot of songs on the soundtrack, but they were all better than I would have expected from a film that didn't label itself a musical. The best of the bunch (which should definitely receive an Oscar nod) is "Wonderful Life," sung by Zendaya's yeti, Meechee. For me, that sequence was the highlight of the film.
The story is clever and overall well told. It is fairly predictable, but has its fun moments. Reversing the "bigfoot" myth is fun. And the film certainly tries to have some big ideas and depth to it.
Smallfoot is also pretty funny. There were some excellent moments that had a Looney Tunes type feel (think poor Wile E. Coyote). And I quite enjoyed the "gibberish" that the yetis perceived the humans as speaking (whereas the humans perceive only growls from the yetis). There were quite a few times where I chuckled during the movie. And there were moments when kids in the theater were laughing out loud.
While there's nothing outstanding about the animation, it is bright and colorful and certainly never detracts from the story.
As for the characters, they are all likable enough (well, except Fleem, who is supposed to be annoying ... I think). But they are also rather bland. None of the characters were particularly memorable. They were just stock characters who happened to be yetis. The character I liked best was actually Percy, the human. He had enough substance to him and even got a decent little character arc.
So, why the mixed feelings? That has to do with the film's theme and message, which is a double-edged sword. On the one side, the story is about being curious, asking questions, and seeking truth. All of which are good. On the other side, however, the film has a decidedly anti-religious bias to it. The start of the film makes that especially clear as it talks about "laws written on stones" and "creation stories." The film seems to equate religion with blind faith and obedience, which is what the yetis live with at the start.
But religion and questions are not diametrically opposed, as the film strongly suggests. Seeking truth and having faith can go hand in hand. Indeed, my own religion was founded because a young man (Joseph Smith) had questions and sought for the truth. And the truth he found changed the way millions the world over see the world and the purpose of life. And the Book of Mormon -- which he translated -- doesn't tell people to blindly follow arbitrary rules. It specifically directs readers to ask and know for themselves. True religion is not about protecting people from the truth or the harsh realities of life. And while commandments and religious rules/laws are there for our protection, it is not in the way the film portrays.
That said, I'm not saying the film is bad. I don't know how overt that anti-religion message was meant to be. I think it detracts from the story, but doesn't ruin it. Rather, it invites discussion. I'm not a parent, but it seems like this is a film that it is fine for children to see, so long as it is with their parents who then are willing to have a discussion about the subject matter. And I figure that's a good thing, because kids are going to be exposed to these ideas anyway. That's just the secular world we live in.
If you need a family film to see before the holiday season kicks in, you could do far worse than Smallfoot. It's colorful, has good music, and mostly has a good message. It can certainly lead to some family discussions.
*** Spoiler Section ***
How come the yeti don't seem to have noses? And how does their machine produce that much of a cloud cover? Also, what's up with the screaming goat?
Quotable Quotes
- "A life that's full of wonder is a wonderful life." -- Meechee
- "You want to save a species on the verge of extinction? Save me!" -- Percy to Brenda
- "Am I missing a tooth?" -- Percy
ISFS
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)