Coco

Year: 2017

Directors: Lee Unkrich and Adrian Molina

Starring: Anthony Gonzalez, Gael Garcia Bernal, Benjamin Bratt, and Alanna Ubach
Tagline: The celebration of a lifetime
Synopsis: In following his dream to become a musician, Miguel finds himself in the Land of the Dead where he must uncover the truth behind his family's ban on music.

Review

Before the feature film is a (not-so) short film: Olaf's Frozen Adventure.  It was a bit twee at points.  It was much longer than it needed to be.  But by the end, it was better than I'd expected and it made me smile (mostly because of Sven and a hawk).

On to Coco!

In a return to what it does best -- original stories that tug at your heartstrings -- Pixar has crafted yet another winner.  I've seen it twice already and look forward to seeing it again.

Although it didn't strike me immediately, I later realized that Coco is Pixar's first musical.  Others of their movies feature songs in the soundtrack, but they don't have the characters themselves breaking into song.  Well, there is Mike Wazowski's "Put That Thing Back Where It Came From," but that doesn't really make Monsters, Inc. a musical.

Coco is a realistic musical.  By that I mean the characters sing in a way that wouldn't be strange in the real world.  Miguel sings at a talent show.  Ernesto sings in a musical production.  This isn't the kind of musical where a character breaks into song to express their emotions and the entire village joins in with harmony and choreography.  Not that there's anything wrong with that kind of musical, but the realistic approach suits Coco, which has enough non-realistic things going on.

The songs are short and fun and suit the film and the characters.  The main song of the film is "Remember Me," and it has been stuck in my head since I saw the film.  There are actually three versions within Coco, two of which will tug at your heart.

Pixar has raised the bar once again in terms of animation.  Coco is breathtakingly beautiful.  The lights, the colors, the marigold petals, the alebrijes, all are gorgeous to look at.  Think back to what Andy and Sid looked like in Toy Story.  Then look at Miguel and Hector.  Animated humans have come a long way since Pixar's early days.  Even the differences in hair and water textures from The Incredibles to now are amazing.  And if that wasn't enough, I read that the animators took the time and effort to ensure that all guitar playing in the movie is accurate.  Miguel is correctly fingering the music when he plays.  Impressive.

I love the humor of Coco (and, let's be honest, of most Pixar films).  The jokes aren't forced, manic, or crude.  They flow naturally from the characters and the situations.  We chuckle at Miguel's family because we recognize ourselves and our own families.  Dante (the Xolo dog) is also fun.  He has some great facial expressions.

Coco would be a good film if it were simply beautiful and funny.  But it's more than that, which is what has long set Pixar film's apart.  Coco has heart.  It's not about Miguel hanging out with skeletons on the Day of the Dead; it's about Miguel connecting with his family in both the living world and the land of the dead.  Miguel's passion is music.  But as his journey continues, he realizes that family is most important of all.  Coco is about treasuring the family we have and remembering the family that has gone before us and the legacy they left us.  Honestly, Coco is like one brilliant, poignant plug for family history work.

The film is rated PG for thematic reasons.  It is a movie that deals unashamedly with death after all.  If your kiddos were OK with The Incredibles they'll be fine with Coco.

Coco is all about what Pixar does best.  It's not quite up to the same level as Finding Nemo, Up, or WALL-E, but it comes pretty close and is a fitting addition to the Pixar lineup of heart-tugging films that take us where we've never been before.  Go see Coco.  Then go home and call your parents/grandparents.


*** Spoiler Section ***
That Hector is actually Miguel's great great grandfather didn't surprise me.  I'd put that together when Hector first showed himself to be a musician.  The fact that Ernesto never questions that he has a great great grandson, and never asks about his family, says quite a bit about Ernesto's character in life and in death.

I went into the film wondering why it was named "Coco."  As the film unfolds, it becomes clear.  Mama Coco is the link, the link between the living and the dead.  She is the link between Miguel and Hector and between Hector and the world of the living.  Coco is why Hector did some of things he did.  And Coco is why Mama Imelda did some of the things she did.

Quotable Quotes

• "I asked for a shoe shine, not your life's story, kid." -- Mariachi player to Miguel
• "I'm terribly allergic."  "But Dante doesn't have any hair."  "And I don't have a nose, yet here we are." -- Clerk and Miguel
• "We need to borrow your guitar."  "Like how you borrowed my van, and my mini fridge, and my femur?!  Where's my femur, Hector?!" -- Hector and Chicharron
• "Aw, that's such a sweet sentiment.  And such bad timing!" -- Hector to Miguel

Justice League

Year: 2017

Director: Zack Snyder

Starring: Ben Affleck, Gal Gadot, Henry Cavill, Ezra Miller, Jason Momoa, Jeremy Irons, Amy Adams, Ray Fisher, Diane Lane, and Ciaran Hinds
Tagline: You can't save the world alone.
Synopsis: With an otherworldly invasion already beginning, Batman must enlist Wonder Woman, Aquaman, the Flash, and Cyborg to unite and save the world.

Review

I grew up watching iterations of Batman and Superman.  I knew their backstories inside out before I'd ever even heard of Iron Man or Captain America.  So as Justice League drew closer, my hopes were high that it would turn out.  Batman v. Superman had filled me with doubt, but Wonder Woman gave me hope that DC could pull it off.  In the end, some of Justice League worked well and some of it didn't.  It's not a great film, but it is an enjoyable one.

First, let's start with some of the problems.  Then we can end on the highlights.

Lego Batman once said, "I only work in black.  And sometimes very, very dark grey."  We get it, he's the Dark Knight.  But the dark and gloomy aesthetic of the DC films is getting old.  Every scene feels moody and visually subdued in blues and greys.  This feels true even when we have colorful characters like Wonder Woman or Flash.  The dark aesthetic is especially jarring when compared to Thor: Ragnarok, which I had seen a few days before.  I understand that DC wants to show itself different from Marvel ... but this might not be the way.

Batman has one of the greatest rogues galleries (villains who oppose him) of any superhero.  Clearly, DC can do excellent, memorable villains.  Steppenwolf isn't one of them, at least not in this iteration.  He wants to take over the world (typical) and reform it like his own (which sounds a bit like General Zod).  He's powerful, without question.  But Steppenwolf is bland.

Another problem with Justice League is that it feels way too similar to Avengers: Age of Ultron at times.  Steppenwolf's parademons are similar to Ultron's army of robots: plentiful and expendable.  They are the perfect fodder for our heroes to show off their skills.  Further, both villains make their base of operations in eastern Europe.  And both villains are bent purely on the destruction of all life on earth.

There are other similarities with Age of Ultron, and other problems with the story, but they are in the Spoiler Section.  Suffice it to say here that the story is enjoyable, but not great or memorable.  Justice League brings nothing new to the superhero table.

The music in Justice League is a mixed bag for me.  I didn't like the choice of songs that were used a couple of times.  Some of that is my own musical taste, but they didn't seem to fit.  The score itself was interesting.  It borrowed the themes from the recent Wonder Woman and Man of Steel films.  But it also subtly incorporated at times some older themes.  Superman's theme from the Christopher Reeve movies is used briefly.  And there are hints of the Batman theme used in the Tim Burton films.

Despite the film's flaws, it is undeniably fun to see these heroes come together and learn to fight side by side.  The film focuses mainly on the motives and histories of Batman and Wonder Woman.  They have some good moments together as they learn from each other and prod each other forward.  The Flash brings some much-needed humor to the film.  He's socially awkward.  As he says: "I need friends."  He's also new to heroics, which makes him a nice balance for the more mature and seasoned Batman.  Aquaman is the tough cynic (who has a great scene involving Wonder Woman's lasso of truth).

Cyborg, though, felt like the weak link.  At times he seemed more like a convenient plot device than a character the film knew what to do with.  His personality seems to have one side: angst.  Yes, his backstory lends itself to being angst-filled.  But he felt the least-developed of all the characters.

In addition to the heroes, we've also got Alfred, Commissioner Gordon, Lois Lane, and Martha Kent.  Each of them play their parts well.  And all the roles (superheroes and allies) feel like they have the right actors.

While Justice League can't begin to compare to the humor found in most Marvel films, Justice League does attempt to have more fun and doesn't take itself as seriously as previous DC films.  Batman and Wonder Woman both have a subtle humor to them.  Alfred offers some great sarcasm and droll wit (as only Jeremy Irons can deliver).  But much of the humor centers around the Flash.  And it mostly works.  The film is a step in the right direction, but it's still missing the humor and heart that made Wonder Woman a winner.

The film is rated PG-13.  I don't remember much language.  The rating is almost entirely for the superhero violence, which might even be a bit less than the previous DC installments.

I enjoyed seeing Justice League.  And I will likely buy it so I can watch it again.  Is it a great film?  No.  But it's got some fun moments.  And it's a step in the right direction.  The movie is partly about not losing hope.  I believe there is still hope for DC films.

There is a mid-credits scene for fun.  There is also a post-credits scene to tease future films.

*** Spoiler Section ***
Superman returns.  That should come as a surprise to nobody.

This is where Justice League is again too similar to Age of Ultron.  Bringing Superman back to life is highly reminiscent of bringing Vision to life.  There is even an almost identical conversation about the wisdom of such a plan.  Some heroes are all for it, driven in part by their own guilt.  Other heroes are against it, because bringing beings to life or back to life is pretty serious stuff.  And in both films, the doubters eventually acknowledge that it was a good idea (as Superman and Vision do the heavy lifting of defeating the villain).

Another qualm I had with the film was, why was Lois Lane plan B and not plan A?  They are bringing Superman back from the dead.  From the dead.  Having four armed strangers (well, Wonder Woman is only a near-stranger) confront him when he first comes back seems like a bad idea from the start.  Why not go straight to the one person he would most want to see?  Then maybe the heroes could have focused on protecting the Mother Cube of World-Destroying Power rather than let Steppenwolf just lazily pick it up off the ground.  Just a thought.

One last thing.  They can explain Superman coming back from the dead.  But how do they explain Clark Kent coming back from the dead?

Quotable Quotes

• "I don't believe it.  Who are you?"  "A believer." -- Terrorist and Wonder Woman
• "Save one person."  "Then what?"  "You'll know." -- Batman and Flash
• "I miss the days when one's biggest concern was exploding wind-up penguins." -- Alfred
• "This wasn't the plan."  "No.  It's the team." -- Batman and Alfred
• "I work with children." -- Wonder Woman (in reference to her teammates)

Thor: Ragnarok

Year: 2017

Director: Taika Waititi

Starring: Chris Hemsworth, Tom Hiddleston, Cate Blanchett, Mark Ruffalo, Idris Elba, Karl Urban, Jeff Goldblum, Tessa Thompson, Benedict Cumberbatch, and Anthony Hopkins
Tagline: Thunder will reign.
Synopsis: Thor must enlist the help of Hulk, a Valkyrie, and the ever-mischievous Loki in order to save Asgard from Hela, goddess of death.

Review

When I saw the first trailer for Thor: Ragnarok, I was nervous.  I wasn't sure about the music or the retro 80s vibe.  And after Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2, I wasn't so sure I liked the comedic direction Marvel was taking.  Within a few minutes of the film, though, I was sold.  Thor: Ragnarok is terrific.  Terrific I say.

First off, this movie is perhaps the funniest Marvel film to date.  From start to finish (and post-credits finish), there is humor.  Thor has developed a sense of fun and irony, especially as he deals with Loki and Hulk/Banner.  Loki is as wonderfully sarcastic as he ever was.  And a number of other new characters steal whatever scene they are in.  The comedic timing is spot on, including Stan Lee's obligatory cameo.

Thor finds himself on the far-off world of Sakaar, which is a long way from the noble and proper Asgard.  The world is colorful and eclectic and personified by Jeff Goldblum's Grandmaster.  Such a manic place lends itself to the humor the film is going for.  Thor's "journey" to first meet the Grandmaster is perfectly trippy and musically recalls another off-kilter character/film (but I won't spoil that).

Thor: Ragnarok has a terrific cast of characters.  As I said, Thor is allowed to be more fun and humorous.  But at the same time, we see how he has also matured since his first outing.  His relationship with Loki is as complicated as ever.  But pairing him with Hulk/Banner is what works so well.

The first Thor film had a very Shakespearean vibe to it (it was directed by Kenneth Branagh after all).  While that tone is long gone for Ragnarok, this film has two characters who struck me as being very Shakespearean: Valkyrie and Skurge.  Their character arcs are nothing new.  Rather, they are more archetypal.  And in both instances, that works.

Hela has the distinction of being Marvel's first main female villain.  (Nebula from Guardians of the Galaxy is only a secondary villain.)  She is a scene-stealing, scene-chewing villainess with sharp knives and an equally sharp tongue.  I got the impression Cate Blanchett loved every minute of it.

Dr. Strange has a brief role in the film (as teased in a mid-credits scene in Doctor Strange).  Though the sequence isn't long, it is funny and works well to keep the every-sprawling Marvel Cinematic Universe connected to Earth and the myriad characters linked to each other.

Of the new characters, the rock-like alien Korg was my favorite.  He's voiced by the film's director, Taika Waititi.  Pretty much everything his unexpectedly high voice says is quotable and put a grin on my face.  He possesses a dogged optimism and self-deprecating humor.  Korg is the best.

Humor and good characters are one thing, but if you don't have a good story to tie them together, you've lost me.  Fortunately, Thor: Ragnarok has a good story to go with it.  Sure, it's another superhero tale and not Shakespeare.  But it still has one of the strongest stories of a Marvel film.  Nearly everything in the plot and story works together seamlessly.  The story ties the zaniness, the sarcasm, the spectacle, and the impending world destruction all together.  And it works.  It works better than its predecessors.  And it's a whole lot of fun along the way.

The film is rated PG-13.  There is some language.  I'll admit, I don't remember it being a lot, but then again, the film I'd seen previously swore quite a bit.  So Thor might just have been mild by comparison.  Still, it was nothing beyond what other Marvel movies have done.  The level of violence is also about the same.  Thor has a shirtless scene (because I'm fairly certain that is written into his contract).  CGI Hulk has a brief bare backside scene.  There are a couple more mature gags.

At this point, there are so many Marvel superhero movies, it's hard to pick favorites.  But Thor: Ragnarok is definitely in my top 5.  Maybe even my top 3.  I look forward to seeing it again.  If you haven't seen it yet, get to it.  And be sure to stay through all the credits.

*** Spoiler Section ***
Thor loses an eye.  I didn't see that coming.

My only complaint about the film was how Lady Sif and the Warriors Three were handled.  Sif wasn't in the film because of scheduling conflicts with actress Jaimie Alexander.  But they might have at least mentioned her and accounted for her absence.  And I was sad by how unceremoniously both Volstagg and Fandral were dispatched by Hela.  Hogun at least gets to die fighting.  But the three aren't ever mentioned again.  Yes, Thor has a lot on his mind, but it would still have been nice to have him acknowledge that three of his best friends are dead.

Given my (admittedly slim) knowledge of Norse mythology, the ending of the film felt appropriate.  Ragnarok isn't something that could be avoided or prevented.  It's something to rebuild from.

Lastly, the three cameos during the Asgardian play are terrific.  Sam Neill is Odin.  Chris Hemsworth's brother, Luke, plays Thor.  And Loki is portrayed by none other than Matt Damon.

Quotable Quotes

• "That's a crown?  I thought those were eyebrows." -- Thor to Surtur
• "I've been falling for 30 minutes!" -- Loki to Dr. Strange
• "I tried to start a revolution, but didn't print enough pamphlets.  So hardly anyone turned up." -- Korg
• "He's a friend from work." -- Thor about the Hulk

Murder on the Orient Express

Year: 2017

Director: Kenneth Branagh

Starring: Kenneth Branagh, Michelle Pfieffer, Johnny Depp, Daisy Ridley, Josh Gad, Willem Dafoe, Derek Jacobi, Leslie Odom Jr., and Judi Dench
Tagline: Everyone is a suspect.
Synopsis: Hercule Poirot must deduce a murderer aboard a luxury train stranded in the snow.

Review

I've never read the Agatha Christie novel.  Nor have I seen any other adaptation.  So I went into Murder on the Orient Express having no idea who the murderer was.  That greatly enhanced my enjoyment of the film.

This was also my first real introduction to Hercule Poirot.  (I'm not sure the spoof version in Murder by Death should count.)  I found Branagh's take on the eccentric Belgian detective to be quite enjoyable.  He has humor, intellect, and just enough heart.  Poirot has most of the best lines in the film and I enjoyed his dry humor and straightforward manner.  While he certainly has an ego, I never felt it became overbearing.

The rest of the cast of characters are well-played but not very fleshed out.  I suppose it is hard to get to know characters who are all on their guard.  They are all suspects and all suspicious of each other.  It was nice to see Daisy Ridley in a role other than Rey (in Star Wars).  And it was interesting to see Josh Gad in a completely non-comedic role (he's the voice of Olaf from Frozen and plays Le Fou in the live action Beauty and the Beast).

Murder on the Orient Express is a period piece.  It takes place in 1934 aboard a luxury train travelling through Europe only to get stuck after an avalanche blocks the tracks.  I enjoyed the cinematography.  The opening scenes nicely set up the time period.  And the claustrophobia of the train cars/compartments is well-used and reflects the characters' own feelings of being trapped and closed in on.

The mystery is well laid out, with plenty of clues, twists, and red herrings.  I've always enjoyed mysteries, so watching Poirot unravel the case was fun.  It kept me engaged, though the film's pacing did slow a bit during his investigation.

The film is rated PG-13, but it's the tamest PG-13 I've seen in a while.  Kids wouldn't enjoy it because of the subject matter and pacing.  I don't recall any swearing, so if there is any, it's mild.  There are a few mild innuendos (watch the trailers, that's about it).  Obviously there's a murder.

Murder on the Orient Express is old-fashioned storytelling.  It's a bit slow at points, but I grew up with films that require a bit of patience.  The story is intriguing, which is why it's still around 80+ years later.  At some point, I look forward to watching the film again, now that I know the end.  It will be interesting to see how everything fits into place.  I would also be pleased to see Kenneth Branagh return to the role of Poirot in another adventure. 

If you are looking for an old-fashioned whodunit, I recommend booking passage on the Orient Express.

*** Spoiler Section ***
Nope.  No spoilers here.  I will say that the ending surprised me.  Not entirely though.  It all clicked into place in a satisfactory way.

Quotable Quotes

• "Forgive me.  I am Belgian." -- Poirot
• "I know your mustache." -- Miss Debenham
• "You're Hercules Poirot."  "Hercule.  I don't fight the lions." -- Miss Debenham and Poirot
• "You are allowed a coincidence." -- Poirot to Princess Dragomir
• "If it were easy, they would not call me 'great.'  Next theory."  -- Poirot to Bouc

Only the Brave

Year: 2017

Director: Joseph Kosinski

Starring: Josh Brolin, Jennifer Connolly, Miles Teller, Jeff Bridges, Taylor Kitsch, and Andie MacDowell
Tagline: It's not what stands in front of you; it's who stands beside you
Synopsis: The story of the Granite Mountain Hotshots based out of Prescott, Arizona.

Review

Only the Brave tells the story of the Granite Mountain Hotshots, one of a number of hotshot crews to fight the Yarnell Hill Fire in Arizona in 2013.  I remember hearing about the story at the time.  It made national headlines.  In case you don't remember the story and don't want the film to be spoiled, I'll say no more until the spoiler section.  But I knew the story before going into the film.

With all the disasters and tragedies the nation and the world have seen lately -- including devastating wildfires in California -- this is a timely film.  It's about ordinary men doing extraordinary things as they risk their lives for the sake of others.  These firefighters are heroes.  But they're also real and flawed.  Only the Brave admirably pays tribute to their humanity and their heroism.

The story centers on Eric Marsh, the supervisor of the hotshots crew (played by Josh Brolin), and Brendan "Donut" McDonough, a rookie (played by Miles Teller).  We get to know both men, see some of their personal lives, and watch how firefighting affects them.  And we come to care about both men.  We get to know some of the other members of the 20-man crew as well and watch them bond and come together.  Jennifer Connolly plays Eric's long-suffering wife, Amanda.  I don't know of any other actress who can portray raw emotion as capably as she does.

It could be said that fire is a character as well in the film.  It's hard to say how much was real and how much was CGI, but the visuals in Only the Brave are top notch.  The film gives the viewer a sense of what wildfires can do, how unpredictable they can be, and how beautiful and terrifying they are.  That's as close to a wildfire as I ever hope to be and I truly stand in awe at those who run toward them rather than away.

The film is rated PG-13.  There is language throughout, including two uses of the F-word (all or partial).  There is also some crass language and drug references.

Only the Brave is a compelling story and a well-made movie.  As one of the reviews I read put it, it's a movie that sticks with you after the credits roll.  And it will leave you with a greater appreciation for the sacrifices firefighters make in the service of others.

*** Spoiler Section ***
For much of the movie, I wondered how exactly it would end, or rather, how it would all wrap up.  With a true story like that, it can be a fine line between fitting tribute and sloppy sentimentality.  Only the Brave remains a fitting tribute to the very end as our focus shifts to Brendan and Amanda and how they struggle and eventually cope with the pain and grief.

The pictures at the end also bring it home that these were real mean with lives and families that they didn't get to return home to.

Quotable Quotes

• "If this isn't the greatest job in the world, I don't know what is." -- Eric Marsh
• "That was six years ago!  I've changed.  This relationship has changed me." -- Amanda Marsh to Eric Marsh
• "You wanna talk about it?  Or are you going to do your John Wayne thing." -- Amanda Marsh to Eric Marsh
• "If you give me a chance, I won't let you down." -- Brendan "Donut" McDonough

The LEGO Ninjago Movie

Year: 2017

Director: Charlie Bean, Paul Fisher, and Bob Logan

Starring: Dave Franco, Justin Theroux, Jackie Chan, and Olivia Munn
Tagline: Find Your Inner Piece
Synopsis: Six teenage ninjas must defend Ninjago -- their hometown -- from the evil warlord Garmadon ... who awkwardly happens to be the dad of one of the ninjas.

Review

Meh.

After the unexpected delightfulness of The LEGO Movie and the manic fun of The LEGO Batman Movie, I had moderate hopes that The LEGO Ninjago Movie would follow in their square, bricky footsteps.  I was disappointed in that hope.

I wouldn't necessarily say LEGO Ninjago is a bad movie.  It isn't that it is poorly made, has gaping plot holes, or is boring.  It's just meh.  The story and message are predictable.  The characters are mostly generic.  Many of the jokes fall flat.  And the music is an odd assortment of repurposed songs.  LEGO Ninjago lacks the originality and creativity of its predecessors.

It also lacks their heart.  For a movie that talks a lot about feelings, the film feels ultimately devoid of any true emotions.  The characters expressed emotions, but they never earned or elicited any out of me.

There were a few moments that made me chuckle though.  The brief appearance of a fuchsia ninja was my favorite.  I also appreciated the scene that utilized the Wilhelm scream five or six times in a row.

If you really need a movie to take the kids to, you could do worse than the LEGO Ninjago movie.  It's harmless enough.  And you might get a few laughs out of it.  Just don't expect adventures like those of Emmett Brickowski or LEGO Batman. 

Quotable Quotes

• "Can I be the element of surprise?" "No.  That is the Fuchsia Ninja."  "Surprise!" -- Lloyd, Master Wu, and the Fuchsia Ninja
• "Right now yours are the wrong hands." -- Master Wu
• "Are you crossing your fingers behind your back?"  "No.  I literally can't do that."  -- Lloyd and Garmadon (who has claw hands like every other LEGO)
• "You have unleashed Meowra." -- Master Wu

Dunkirk

Year: 2017

Director: Christopher Nolan

Starring: Fionn Whitehead, Aneurin Barnard, Tom Hardy, Mark Rylance, and Kenneth Branagh
Tagline: When 400,000 men couldn't get home, home came for them.
Synopsis: This is the story of the Dunkirk evacuation during WWII, as told from three interwoven perspectives: the land, the sea, and the air.

Review

Wow.  Seriously.  Wow.  Director Christopher Nolan has crafted an incredible film in a way that only he can.  Dunkirk is beautiful, gripping, mesmerizing, and an all around well-made movie.

Every component works together to create a film that will stick with you long after the credits roll.  The cinematography is amazing.  They actually strapped cameras onto old British Spitfire's in order to get some of the aerial shots.  The film feels real because so much of it is real.  CGI can do a lot these days and is more realistic looking than ever, but it still cannot compare to real planes, real ships, and the real world.  Dunkirk has all of that.  In fact, some of the actual little ships (private boats and yachts) used in the Dunkirk evacuation were used in the film.  If you ever splurge and see movies in IMAX, this is one to see large format (which I did).

Working right along with the visuals is Hans Zimmer's incredible soundtrack.  The music is so fully integrated into the film, it feels impossible to say where the noises of the film end and the music begins.  They feel one and the same.  Throughout the score is the sound of a ticking clock, highlighting the fact that time is as much the enemy as the Germans in this rescue/evacuation.  (Interesting note: the ticking noise was recorded from Nolan's own pocket watch.  He's that cool.)  What really got to me -- as a bit of an Anglophile -- was how Zimmer incorporated "Nimrod" from Edward Elgar's Enigma Variations during some of the most climactic moments.  You might not recognize the name, but you may well recognize the very British melody (so well loved it was used during the closing ceremony of the London Olympics).  That particular musical cue adds a dramatic punch like no other music could.

As amazing as the visuals and soundtrack are, they are both tools in Nolan's arsenal to tell a gripping story.  And Dunkirk is gripping.  The subject matter itself is larger than life: the evacuation of 400,000 men.  But how do you tell that story in a coherent manner?  Nolan seems to be the king of the non-linear narrative and he brought his A game here.  The film involves three interwoven stories, each of which occurs for a different duration of time.  The film seamlessly moves back and forth between the three stories (and thus different time frames) in a way that was never confusing.  As the film continues, we realize just how interconnected the three stories are.  And it is brilliant.

One interesting decision Nolan made with Dunkirk is that it is more the story of the evacuation than of individuals.  We follow various individuals throughout the film and see the events through their perspectives, but it isn't a character driven film.  Nor is there really any character development.  And in this film, it works.  Even though the characters don't have arcs, they all feel real.  We may not know many of their backstories, but their actions are all believable.  They are each, to some degree an Everyman.  There are moments of heroics.  And there are moments of selfishness.  None of them feel forced.

One of the more fleshed out characters is Mr. Dawson, the owner of a boat that accepts the call to sail to Dunkirk and bring back men.  We are given some of his history, which helps us understand some of his words and actions.  But what I love about Mr. Dawson is that he is the embodiment of the British attitude of keep calm and carry on.  And it's not a front.  It truly is his character.

In preparing for this film, Nolan apparently watched a number of silent films.  Dunkirk is not a talkative movie.  Body language accounts for much of the emotional story telling.  For instance, there is a moment when Farrier (an RAF pilot) must make a decision.  There's no one for him to talk to.  He doesn't say a word.  But you can see it in his eyes and in his subtle movements as he makes his choice.  The moment is a brilliant example of visual storytelling.

One of the most striking things about Dunkirk is the lack of Germans.  Except for a couple of shadowy, out-of-focus soldiers at the end, we don't see a single German soldier.  They are represented only through gunfire and planes.  It really contributes to the idea that in the evacuation, the overarching antagonist was time.

Unlike most war movies, Dunkirk is rated PG-13.  There is violence, but it is not gruesome or bloody.  But there are bodies.  The film, however, is intense.  Really intense.  It hits you in the opening minutes and never lets up until the credits roll.  Be prepared to be on the edge of your seat.  The film also has some swearing, though I only remember them in one particularly stressful scene.

If you can't tell, I loved Dunkirk.  It is one of the best, most well-crafted movies I have seen in years.  I saw it again this weekend.  It's just as epic and incredible the second time.  And it fully deserves to be seen in IMAX.

*** Spoiler Section ***
For much of the movie, I wondered how exactly it would end, or rather, how it would all wrap up.  Nolan did not let us down.  Having Tommy -- weary but relieved to be home -- read aloud Winston Churchill's rousing "We shall fight on the beaches" speech works well.

The end is all the more bittersweet as we realize how much Farrier (the pilot) has sacrificed.  He has landed his plane in enemy territory and is now a prisoner of war.  While over 300,000 men made it home, he didn't.

Quotable Quotes

• "He's on me."  "I'm on him." -- Collins and Farrier
• "Is he a coward?"  "No, George.  He's shell-shocked.  He's not himself.  He may never be himself again." -- George and Mr. Dawson
• "You should be at home!" "There won't be a home if we allow a slaughter across the Channel." -- The shell-shocked soldier and Mr. Dawson
• "You can practically see it from here."  "What?"  "Home." -- Commander Bolton and Captain Winnant